Archive for May, 2017

Republicans Race The Clock On Health Care But The Calendar Is Not Helping – Kaiser Health News

By Julie Rovner May 22, 2017

We encourage organizations to republish our content, free of charge. We dont require much.

For those who need to know the legal underpinnings of using our content, we make it available under the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license. Heres what we ask:

You must credit us as the original publisher, with a hyperlink to our site: Kaiser Health News. If possible, please include the original author(s) and Kaiser Health News in the byline. If youd like to explain more about who we are, please use: a national health policy news service that is part of the nonpartisan Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You may use our logo when linking to or posting materials on your site: Download high-resolution .PNG file

Please preserve the hyperlinks in the story.

Its important to note, not everything on khn.org is our original content or available for republishing. If a story is labeled All Rights Reserved, KHN cannot grant permission to republish that item.

Have questions? Let us know at KHNHelp@kff.org

Back in January, Republicans boasted they would deliver a repeal and replace bill for the Affordable Care Act to President Donald Trumps desk by the end of the month.

In the interim, that bravado has faded as their efforts stalled and they found out how complicated undoing a major law can be. With summer just around the corner, and most of official Washington swept up in scandals surrounding Trump, the health overhaul delays are starting to back up the rest of the 2018 agenda.

One of the immediate casualties is the renewal of the Childrens Health Insurance Program. CHIP covers just under 9 million children in low- and moderate-income families, at a cost of about $15 billion a year.

Funding for CHIP does not technically end until Sept. 30, but it is already too late for states to plan their budgets effectively. They needed to know about future funding while their legislatures were still in session, but, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the local lawmakers have already adjourned for the year in more than half of the states.

If [Congress] had wanted to do what states needed with respect to CHIP, it would be done already, said Joan Alker of the Georgetown Center for Children and Families.

Certainty and predictability [are] important, agreed Matt Salo, executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors. If we dont know that the money is going to be there, we have to start planning to dismantle things early, and that has a real human toll.

In a March letter urging prompt action, the Medicaid directors noted that while the end of September might seem far off, as the program nears the end of its congressional funding, states will be required to notify current CHIP beneficiaries of the termination of their coverage. This process may be required to begin as early as July in some states.

CHIP has long been a bipartisan program one of its original sponsors is Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who chairs the Finance Committee that oversees it. It was created in 1997, and last reauthorized in 2015, for two years. But a Finance hearing that was intended to launch the effort to renew the program was abruptly canceled this month, amid suggestions that Republicans might want to hold the programs renewal hostage to force Democrats and moderate Republicans to make concessions on the bill to replace the Affordable Care Act.

Its a very difficult time with respect to childrens coverage, said Alker. Not only is the future of CHIP in doubt, but also the House-passed health bill would make major cuts to the Medicaid program, and many states have chosen to roll CHIP into the Medicaid program.

Weve just achieved a historic level in coverage of kids, she said, referring to a new report finding that more than 93 percent of eligible U.S. children now have health insurance under CHIP. Now all three legs of that coverage stool CHIP, Medicaid and ACA are up for grabs.

But its not just CHIP at risk due to the congested congressional calendar. Congress also cant do the tax bill Republicans badly want until lawmakers wrap up the health bill.

That is because Republicans want to use the same budget procedure, called reconciliation, for both bills. That procedure forbids a filibuster in the Senate and allows passage with a simple majority.

Theres a catch, though. The health bills reconciliation instructions were part of the fiscal 2017 budget resolution, which Congress passed in January. Lawmakers would need to adopta fiscal 2018 budget resolution in order to use the same fast-track procedures for their tax changes.

And they cannot do both at the same time. Once Congress adopts a new budget resolution for fiscal year 2018, said Ed Lorenzen, a budget-process expert at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, that new resolution supplants the fiscal year 2017 resolution and the reconciliation instructions in the fiscal year 2017 budget are moot.

That means if Congress wanted to continue with the health bill, it would need 60 votes in the Senate, not a simple majority.

There is, however, a loophole of sorts. Congress can start the next budget resolution before they finish health care, said Lorenzen. They just cant finish the new budget resolution until they finish health care.

So the House and Senate could each pass its own separate budget blueprint, and even meet to come to a consensus on its final product. But they cannot take the last step of the process with each approving a conference report or identical resolutions until the health bill is done or given up for dead. They could also start work on a tax plan, although, again, they could not take the bill to the floor of the Senate until they finish health care and the new budget resolution.

At least thats what most budget experts and lawmakers assume. Theres no precedent to go on, said Lorenzen, because no budget reconciliation bill has taken Congress this far into a fiscal year. So nobody really knows.

Link:
Republicans Race The Clock On Health Care But The Calendar Is Not Helping - Kaiser Health News

Kelly: Why more Republicans are questioning their loyalty to Trump – NorthJersey.com

The Record and NorthJersey.com columnist Mike Kelly asks people about President Donald Trump's first 100 days in office and what they feel are the issues facing their region of the country. CHRIS PEDOTA/NORTHJERSEY.COM

A Republican approached me last week. He wanted to confess a deep secret he had been keeping for months.

I didnt vote for Trump, he said.

He was not the only repentant Republican to say this. By the end of the week, I heard the same sentiments from three other GOP loyalists.

A trend? Maybe. Maybe not. But something is clearly changing with Americas love affair with Donald J. Trump as some Republicans are privately asking if they have made a gross mistake. A few are even coming forward to suggest that Vice President Mike Pence would be a fine replacement. Or as conservative blogger Erick Erickson wrote last week: Republicans who are reflexively defending the self-inflicted wounds of this president have no need for him with Mike Pence in the wings.

Can Mike Pence escape the controversies engulfing the White House?

Kelly: Sleepy Bedminster settles into new role as Trump getaway

So much for loyalty. And its only May just four months into Trumps administration.

Even Kellyanne Conway, the presidents special adviser from Alpine, found herself mired in the doubting-Republican fray last week. The just-engaged-to-be-married co-hosts of the MSNBC show, Morning Joe, Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough, disclosed that Conway complained extensively off-camera to them last fall about trying to defend Trumps policies and gaffes as his campaign manager. Brzezinski, the progressive foil to her conservative fianc, Scarborough,even quoted Conway as saying, after one of her appearances on the show, that she would have to take a shower because it feels so dirty to be saying what Im saying.

Conway quickly denied that she expressed any disloyalty toward Trump. No surprise there. If she admitted her doubts, she would have been fired. My beliefs, commitments and loyalties are plain to see, she wrote in a Twitter statement.

You will recall that Conway once pledged her loyalty to U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, when the Texas Republican was challenging Trump for the GOP presidential nomination. You might also recall that Conway has an odd habit of falling into rhetorical potholes. One of her most recent and notorious examples told to this columnist in response to a simple question on whether she believed that President Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower was her claim that microwaves could be used to secretly spy on unsuspecting people.

Conway tried to deny that statement too. But in this case, there was a video by The Record and for all the world to watch, just as there was a video when she wrongly suggested "alternative facts" would prove that Trump had a larger audience than President Obama at his inauguration.

Paradox of Kellyanne Conway: A smart political operative prone to rhetorical missteps

Kellyanne Conway alludes to even wider surveillance of Trump campaign

Kelly: What happened when I asked Kellyanne Conway about wiretapping

The point here is not whether Conway is loyal to Trump. Maybe after her experience with Ted Cruz, she felt the need for a conversion to the man with the golden hair and orange makeup. Or perhaps the world of consultants and advisers that Conway inhabits allows for political loyalty to become just a giant shell game. One day, youre shilling for Ted Cruz; another day, its Donald Trump. And next year? Who knows?

Dont expect Conway or anyone like her in the high levels of the Trump administration to make a public repentance yet. Look to the rank-and-file Republicans to lead the way.

President Donald Trump's Senior Counselor Kellyanne Conway talks about alternative facts and Bowling Green with Record columnist Mike Kelly. Michael Karas/NorthJersey.com

1 of 5

President Donald Trump's Senior Counselor Kellyanne Conway talks about how shes been treated by critics, women, and the media, with Record columnist Mike Kelly. Michael Karas/NorthJersey.com

2 of 5

President Donald Trump's Senior Counselor Kellyanne Conway talks about selfies and Google with Record columnist Mike Kelly. Michael Karas/NorthJersey.com

3 of 5

President Donald Trump's Senior Counselor Kellyanne Conway talks about wiretaps with Record columnist Mike Kelly. Michael Karas/NorthJersey.com

4 of 5

President Donald Trump's Senior Counselor Kellyanne Conway talks about her childhood and conservative feminism at her home in Alpine, N.J., with Record columnist Mike Kelly. Michael Karas/NorthJersey.com

5 of 5

Video: Kellyanne Conway on 'alternative facts' and Bowling Green

Video: Kellyanne Conway on critics and media

Video: Kellyanne Conway on 'what goes viral'

Video: Kellyanne Conway: 'There are many ways to surveil each other'

Video: Kellyanne Conway on her childhood and feminism

What seems to be happening is that Republicans are seriously starting to examine the deal they made with Donald Trump. All you have to do is listen to the snippets of conversation.

What Im hearing from many Republicans is that they never liked Trump. He did not seem to hold clear views on such moral issues as abortion. And then, there is his treatment of women. Remember that Access Hollywood tape about all the grabbing he likes to do with his pick-up gal-pals?

Nor did Trump seem to have a clear focus on the nuances of international politics. Remember those statements about threatening to nuke North Korea, then proclaiming he would be honored to sit down for a talk with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. Republicans wondered smartly whether this was a new version of good-cop, bad-cop. That strategy works nicely on TV.North Korea is another reality.

Yes, Trump spoke off the cuff on issues many Republicans like that. And, yes, he embraced the Tea Partys faux-revolutionary mantra of draining the swamp in Washington and remaking the federal government into some sort of low-tax, low-budget operation that would still be able to pave roads and fight wars, but also offer all sorts of personal freedom to all those Americans who claim to feel oppressed by the evils of "big government."

Donald Trump(Photo: Susan Walsh/AP)

For a while, people actually believed this narrative. But now, we are seeing the unraveling of an unraveled man and his presidency.

Each week seems to serve up a new omelet of craziness. The most recent foibles range from Trumps disclosure of classified information to Russian officials to the presidents brazen admission that fired FBI Director James Comey because Comey refused to halt the Bureaus investigation of allegations that the Trump campaign may have illegally colluded with Russia in the presidential election. Trump's admission of why he fired Comey led Republicans in Congress to quietly wonder if Trump may have tried to obstruct justice.

In case you wondered, obstruction of justice is a federal crime punishable by impeachment. Having interviewed plenty of criminals here in New Jersey, this columnist knows all too well that only a fool would ever admit that he was trying obstruct justice. The FBI has a solid track record here in New Jersey of sending crooked politicians to jail for trying to impede their investigations. Trump seems to be daring them. (Memo to Trump: Daring the FBI to investigate you is not smart.)

100 days later: Road trip through a divided nation

Kelly: A journey through forgotten America

Maybe this cloud will pass over Trump. But more Republicans are now opening their eyes and realizing that the conservative agenda they hoped would be part of Trumps legacy is being slowly choked by a thicket of questions about corruption and incompetence.

On Friday, Politico reported that Trumps approval rating among voters had dropped to a new low, with only 41 percent of Americans saying they thought the president was doing a good job and 53 percent disapproving of him. No president in the last 60 years has managed to disappoint the nation as much as Trump has. Whats next? A 30 percent rating? A 20 percent? Chris Christie knows how easy it is to sink to that low.

Trump blames the media yes, the fake news produced by hard-working journalists like many of my colleagues at The Record and NorthJersey.com who have an annoying habit of working long hours to double-checkfacts and followup leads.

Kelly: Welcome to the Divided States of America

Kelly: Why Trump's latest dilemma is a crisis for journalism

What America is starting to realize at least those Americans not handcuffed to blind ideology is that we are seeing old-fashioned journalism at its best now, the daily grind of following the trail of facts. And so far, that trail has revealed a president who is rapidly becoming little more than a laughing stock.

Yes, Republicans are finally starting to open their eyes. A few are even admitting that they did not vote for Trump. Stay tuned. More will come clean.

Confession is a wonderful thing.

Sometimes it changes hearts.

To contact Record columnist Mike Kelly:

Email: kellym@northjersey.com

Twitter: @MikeKellyColumn

Read or Share this story: https://njersy.co/2qMqaeB

Here is the original post:
Kelly: Why more Republicans are questioning their loyalty to Trump - NorthJersey.com

IRS Probe of Bitcoin Goes Too Far, GOP Warns – Fortune

A closely-watched fight between the Internal Revenue Service and a popular bitcoin exchange took a new twist last week, as senior Republicans in Congress sent a sharply-worded letter that suggests the tax agency is overstepping its powers.

The letter concerns an IRS investigation into possible tax evasion by customers who use Coinbase, a San Francisco-based company that many people use to buy digital currencies. As part of the investigation, which began last year, officials demanded that Coinbase turn over information for every one of its accounts.

Coinbase and its customers are currently in court trying to block the demand, saying it's too broad, and now the letter from the Republicans is likely to give them extra ammunition.

"The summons is estimated to affect 500,000 active Coinbase customers and would result in the production of millions of pages of associated records, many of which contain personally identifiable information ... Based on the information before us, this summons seems overly broad, extremely burdensome, and highly intrusive to a large population of individuals ," says the letter, which is signed by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Ut), Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and by Vern Buchanan and Kevin Brady, who head the House Committee on Ways and Means. (my emphasis)

Get Data Sheet , Fortune s technology newsletter.

The Republicans' concerns echo those of Coinbase and its customers, who argue the IRS does not need every single Coinbase account to carry out its audit, and that the investigation sweeps in people who have clearly done nothing wrong.

The tax agency, for its part, has pointed out that only 802 Coinbase users filed a tax form related to bitcoin in 2015, which suggests large number of people have failed to declare capital gains related to bitcoin.

The IRS investigation also comes at a time when the price of bitcoin has been on an incredible tear, climbing from $13 in 2013 to a new high of over $2,000 last week. Those who profited from the higher priceseither by selling bitcoin for dollars or exchanging it for merchandiseare required to pay taxes on the gain.

Some Coinbase customers, however, have not sold any bitcoin at all while many others hold only a minimal amount, raising questions of why the IRS demanded information about every account.

One theory, according to a lawyer who spoke with Fortune late last year, is that the IRS's sweeping demand is a negotiating tactic to make Coinbase more cooperative, and that the two sides will reach an agreement to allow the agency to inspect some, but not all, of the accounts.

The letter from the Republicans, which asks the IRS to explain its strategy for enforcing tax payments on digital currency by June 7, is likely to put pressure on the agency to come to a deal with Coinbase.

See the rest here:
IRS Probe of Bitcoin Goes Too Far, GOP Warns - Fortune

Can Cory Booker Win Over Progressives? – New Republic

That speech had some wishing Booker were accepting the nomination rather than Clinton, but the Trump era has brought renewed scrutiny of his record from progressives. Like all of his Democratic colleagues and even two Republican senators, Booker voted against the confirmation of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. But he was rightly called out for hypocrisy, given that he previously worked with DeVos to promote school choice policies, including private school vouchers. Booker also voted against an affordable drug proposal from Senator Bernie Sanders, before ultimately backing a compromise bill. Booker said his initial opposition was based on the need for safety provisions, but critics werent buying it. This is silly, given that Americans already import drugs from Canada illegally and it hasnt resulted in a public health emergency, argued the New Republics Alex Shephard. Similarly, the Canadian drug industry doesnt exactly have a reputation for being dangerous. Voxs Jeff Stein wrote that while its true that his vote may have had more to do with the concentration of the pharmaceutical industry in his home state, its also only served to confirm some progressives suspicions that hes too closely allied with corporate interests in the Democratic Party.

Much of the criticism of Booker is still about tone. Adam Green of the Progressive Change Campaign committee said Booker has been getting better over the years, but still needs to do more:

One of the biggest issues some people had with Cory Booker over the years is an unwillingness to name villainswhich is an essential part of story telling and which Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders do very well. Unfortunately, Trump did this in 2016 and sold people on the idea that their economic pain was the result of immigrants and other races as opposed to corporate CEOs who arent sharing wealth with workers. Fortunately, Booker has begun to be more aggressive in the Trump era, and its a pending question as to whether he will be willing to call out Wall Street bank CEOs for defrauding millions of Americans and hurting our economy. We shall see, but things are progressing.

Moulitsas argues anyone thinking about 2020 needs to catch up with the grassrootsor ideally get ahead of themwhen it comes to stopping Trump and the Republican Congress. He foresees a massive field of Democratic candidates: Im absolutely convinced that were going to have an embarrassment of riches. That means progressives dont need to settle for second best. Our bench is growing, he said. The reason Im even taking a call about 2020 is because Democrats today need to think about what 2019 looks like. The first question anybody in the resistance is going to ask is where was this person in 2017? If they werent with us in 2017, that will make it really easy to whittle down that list.... Youre either with the resistance today or I would say dont even bother running.

Booker sees himself as very much with the resistance. He took a big stand against his colleague Jeff Sessionss nomination for attorney general, joining Representative John Lewis to testify against him. In January, NJ Advance Media called Booker a leading voice of dissent in the Democratic Party as the Donald Trump era begins, adding, Its a sudden turn of events for a lawmaker who arrived at the U.S. Capitol with a reputation for liking the spotlight but instead sought to hide from its glare, working quietly with members of both parties to advance legislation and using his celebrity status to help elect more Senate Democrats. At CAP on Tuesday, Booker said, I want to fight in this climate. I want to dedicate myself. But we cannot just be a party of resistanceweve got to be a party thats reaffirming that American dream.

Booker has long preached unity and transcendence. Progressives may want him to name villains, but he told Salon in 2013, I dont believe in wholesale vilification of any industry in the United States. The title of his book last year says it all: United: Thoughts on Finding Common Ground and Advancing the Common Good. Hes worked across the aisle for good, as with his work on criminal justice reform with Senator Rand Paul, and for ill, as with his corporate school reform efforts in Newark with Governor Chris Christie and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.

Last summer, in a sign that he sees Booker as a political threat, Trump attacked the senators impassioned convention speech:

Booker responded neither with snark nor insult, instead telling Trump, I love you, I just dont want you to be my president.

Booker has long been compared to Obama, for reasons both lazy and legitimate. Their race aside, theyre both gifted orators who call for healing divisions, building bridges, overcoming political cynicism and partisan rancorin other words, they evangelize for hope. Theyre also not easy to pin down ideologically, and have angered their fair share of progressives and centrists. Tad Devine, who served as Bernie Sanderss senior strategist last year, said any comparisons to Obama would serve Booker well. I think voters would say theyd like another round of that, thank you very much, he said.

But the message that worked for Obama in 2008, after eight years of hopeless wars under President George W. Bush, may not work for Booker in 2020, after four years of chaos and incompetence under Trump. If progressives mood today is any indication, the Democratic base will demand anger and fiery obstructionism, which is hardly Bookers style. If he adopted such a persona in the partys primary, would the Bernie wing believe it? Not likely.

Booker also thinks its a mistake for Democrats to become what were trying to replace, treating Trump and Republicans like the GOP treated Obama. I literally have these arguments with supporters or fellow Democrats all the time, he said earlier this month on The Ezra Klein Show, where they say, Enough with the love and kindness stuff, Cory. Weve got to fight. And I say, When are those mutually exclusive?.... I think, again, we lose a bit of our moral compass when we are demonizing other people. He added, I just dont believe you need to be mean, you need to be deceitful, you need to practice the dark arts in order to win elected offices.

Booker may not have to completely transform himself to win the Democratic nomination, either. If he can monopolize support from black voterswhich may require outmaneuvering Kamala Harrisand pick up enough moderate Democrats, he could conceivably be the partys pick to take down Trump. While Bookers lack of populist bona fides could prove damaging in a general election, too, a constitutional crisis may well override concerns about, say, his Wall Street ties. But even in that scenario, its hard to imagine Booker succeeding with his same old message. Its hard to be both a lover and a fighterand you certainly cant kill Trump with kindness.

See the original post here:
Can Cory Booker Win Over Progressives? - New Republic

Maryland progressives need to act fast in the governor’s race – Washington Post

May 21 at 7:31 PM

Maryland Del. David Moon (D-Montgomery) has his heart in the right place, asking the states political power brokers to delay taking sides in the 2018 governors race [Democrats are divided on support strategy, Metro, May 18]. In recent races, their big thumbs came down hard on the scale, limiting the competition needed to produce the strongest candidate.

But not all early endorsements are problematic. It is one thing for leaders of the Democratic establishment to weigh in prematurely. But progressive groups new to the landscape lack the financial resources to be big players in the money primary. For them, an early endorsement may be necessary to participate meaningfully in a primary contest. Our Revolution Marylands county chapters began a process for our members to evaluate candidates, aiming to produce a popular, consensus endorsement for our state group.We are sending questionnaires to prospective candidates on issues of concern to progressive voters, with a candidates forum planned for the end of June.

This process is an antidote to the usual big thumbs giving voice to voters excluded from halls of power. Our open, democratic process will engage previously disenfranchised progressive Marylanders. It should also encourage candidates to make commitments on progressive policy that establishment candidates in recent high-profile races avoided making. That will create a process apart from political insiders usual money-raising contests, and it will serve the winner well in the general election.

Ed Fischman, Bethesda

The writer is chairman of Our Revolution Maryland Montgomery County.

Here is the original post:
Maryland progressives need to act fast in the governor's race - Washington Post