Mediaboss Marketing

In the weeks after Donald Trump won last year's presidential election and Republicans kept control of Congress, Sarah Dohl, with a of friends and former Capitol Hill colleagues, wanted Americans mostly distraught Democrats to know that their voices could still be heard.

Not expecting much, they published online a 26-page document in mid-December, outlining a succinct idea: resist.

Its title, "Indivisible: A Practical Guide for Resisting the Trump Agenda," quickly drew interest. George Takei, the actor who starred in the television series "Star Trek," posted a link to it on Twitter. So did former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, who worked in the Clinton administration.

"We just had no idea it would turn into this huge movement," Dohl said Saturday. "We thought our moms might read it."

What at first started with a small group of young progressives batting around ideas on how to move forward under a Trump administration has blossomed into a national movement, known as Indivisible. The mission centers on grass-roots advocacy targeting members of Congress inclined to work with the new administration and those who, in Indivisible's view, don't do enough to oppose it.

In keeping with the loose structure of other movements such as Black Lives Matter, Indivisible isn't a hierarchical organization with a national headquarters and local chapters. Instead, it's a collection of groups committed to employing tactics and operating on principles shared by Indivisible's founders online.

Early on, the focus was attacking Republican efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

Members of the movement have caused representatives to flee town halls and, at times, cancel public events altogether. They've corralled constituents, visited district offices and made phone calls en masse demanding answers.

Not all people who flooded congressional town halls in recent weeks were part of or had even heard of Indivisible. But many were.

"Every member of Congress cares about how their constituents view them and the narrative being formed in their districts," said Dohl, who has held several jobs on Capitol Hill, including communications director for Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas. "And we're not just focused on Republicans. This is about Democrats standing up and having a spine and pushing back against Trump and Republicans."

A chapter in the published Indivisible guide is titled, "How your member of Congress thinks and how to use that to save Democracy." It offers a simple point:

"To influence your own Member of Congress (MoC), you have to understand one thing: every House member runs for office every two years and every Senator runs for election every six years. Functionally speaking, MoCs are always either running for office or getting ready for their next election a fact that shapes everything they do."

The strategy, said Dohl, echoes the tea party movement that sprang up in 2009. At the time, President Barack Obama's efforts to pass the Affordable Care Act caused a conservative uproar. Images of constituents, angered by the legislation and jabbing fingers in lawmakers' faces, filled television screens and front pages nationwide. The next election cycle, Democrats, who at the time had controlled both chambers of Congress, lost the House.

Now, members of the movement hope it's the reverse.

"We're seeing people who have never been involved in politics now motivated to speak up," said Ezra Levin, who came up with the idea for the online guide and is now president of Indivisible Guide, which recently registered as nonprofit group. He worked with Dohl on Capitol Hill in 2009, during the rise of the tea party.

On Saturday, the two celebrated the Repbublican collapse on health care. A day earlier, House Speaker Paul Ryan pulled a bill that would have repealed and replaced the Affordable Care Act because it did not have enough support. Many in the Freedom Caucus, among the most conservative members of Congress, thought the bill did not dismantle the law enough. Democrats and moderate Republicans thought it went too far.

Levin credits Indivisible groups for influencing moderates such as Rep. Barbara Comstock, a Republican who represents a swing district in Virginia.

For weeks, Comstock declined requests from constituents some of whom are associated with Indivisible for an in-person town hall. Her Capitol Hill and district offices were also flooded with phone calls from constituents seeking more access to her.

On Friday, hours before the bill was pulled, Comstock said she would not support it.

"This is setting the tone for members of Congress to know that constituents are paying attention," Levin said. "And they're not going to stop. This is going forward for months and years."

Laynette Evans, a career coach and resume writer, is among the early organizers of Indivisible Reno.

The Reno group has about 1,100 Facebook members and has met a few of times to talk about how to get their representatives at all levels of government Democrats and Republicans alike to hear them out on issues including health care and immigration.

"It's putting politicians on notice," said Evans, a Democrat. "With the election of Donald Trump, I think more people are becoming engaged in politics and how our country is being governed."

In January, a day after Trump's inauguration, millions of people joined women's marches nationwide. As protests of Trump have ensued, several states have sought to pass legislation that would discourage or criminalize protest. And Trump has described protesters those at town halls or marching in the streets as paid professionals who specialize in disrupting Republicans.

After the failure to repeal the Affordable Care Act, Trump has indicated he's ready to move on to other issues, such as tax reform.

Whatever the proposal, Trump and Republicans will probably face Indivisible, Levin said.

The resistance is not going away, he said.

Read more here:
Young progressives lead Indivisible, the resistance to Trump - MyAJC

Liberals are pushing in from the left with their own health-care solutions, looking to gain new ground after last weeks Republican meltdown over an Obamacare replacement.

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee, a political action committeethat aims to represent the Elizabeth Warren wing of the Democratic Party, began circulating a petition Wednesday calling for every person to have access to a Medicare-type plan an idea supported by the partys left wing but viewed with some skepticism by moderates.

Theres broad agreement across the political spectrum that parts of the health-care law need fixing, most pressingly the premium spikes and insurer exits from the laws insurance marketplaces. Liberal advocates and lawmakers see a fresh opportunity for rallying their side around the issue after House Republicans abruptly halted efforts late last week to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.

[Senate Democrats offer to work with Trump on health care but only if he ends attack on Obamacare]

I think Friday made it clear there is no consensus and no path forward from the right, and if theres going to be a path forward its going to come from progressives, said PCCC spokeswoman Kaitlin Sweeney.

Liberals still have little hope of enacting their solutions, with the GOP controllingthe White House and Congress. But theyre trying to lay the groundwork for electoral victories in 2018 and 2020 that could open new doors.

We are already working with our friends in Congress to build momentum for this idea and make it a high-profile 2018 issue, says the petition, which the group was emailing out Wednesday afternoon.

There are some small but notable signs that momentum is building for more government-run health insurance.

The House already had a single-payer bill in the form of HR 676, the Expanded & Improved Medicare For All Act, which Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) introduces in every Congress. Since the collapse of the GOPs American Health Care Act, three new Democrats, Reps. Donald Payne Jr. (N.J.), Nydia M. Velzquez (N.Y.) and Peter A. DeFazio (Ore.), have signed on as co-sponsors, bringing its total number of endorsements to 75. The measure had just 62 co-sponsors when Conyers introduced it in 2015.

And over the weekend, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced a single-payer bill; on Twitter, liberal activists had already been pressuring other senators to endorse it.

Republicans, reeling from the Obamacare fight, have highlighted the single-payer push as evidence that the Democrats will go too far.

Obamacare is collapsing as a result of its top-down, government centered approach and the Democrats only answer is more government, Jesse Hunt, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee said in a statement. The question remains, how many other Democrats will join the chorus to appease the activist base of the Party thats clamoring for far-left policies?

But advocates and commentators on the left note that support for the idea of single-payer system is as high as its ever been. The PCCC petition points to a recent Pew survey showing that 85 percent of Democrats and 60 percent of Americans overall said the government is responsible for providing health coverage for all.

A Monday essay for the socialist magazine Jacobin by Harvard Medical School instructor Adam Gaffney argued that there was no better time to fight for single-payer than after the repeal fight revealed public support for wider coverage.

Politicians have yet to follow the populace, but, with enough grassroots activism, they can be pressured and flipped, or if recalcitrant confronted with primary challenges or defeated at the polls, Gaffney wrote. The insurance industry will no doubt fight to the death, but its enormously unpopular, and surmountable.

See more here:
Liberals see fresh opportunity in health care after GOP meltdown - Washington Post

OTTAWA The federal Liberals are putting on a political press to sell their child-care budget pledge, calling itambitiousin the face of questions about whether thefunding is too modest to make a significant difference for families.

The Liberals have promised to spend $7.5 billion over a decade on child care, starting with $500 millionin the new fiscal year that starts this weekend andincreasing to $870 million annually by 2026 to fund spaces in provinces and territories, as well as indigenous child care on and off-reserve.

For advocates who havewaitedyears for the federal government to kick in cash to help expand and subsidize child-care services, the money is seen as a start, but far from enough to cover the whole country.

The annual funding is belowwhat the Paul Martin Liberals offered provinces in 2005 and below whatfederal officialslast year told the minister in charge of the file would be needed to make a measurable effect on the number of child-care spaces countrywide.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said his government's pledge would have a "huge" impact on low- and modest-income families, calling it a "historic investment."

"These are the kinds of things that we need to do to ensure that every family has the opportunity to make the choices that are right for them," Trudeau said at a Winnipeg daycare.

The actual provincial and territorial allocations will be unveiled once funding agreements are signed, butfirst, the Liberals have to get provinces and territories to agree on the final text of a multilateralagreement that would lay out the key policy goals of the child-care money.

The money could potentially create 40,000 subsidized spaces for low and modest-income families over the next three years, about 13,000 spaces a year orabout 2.4per cent of theroughly 543,000regulated child care spaces in Canada for childrenfive and under.

The Liberals calculated the impact based on an annualfederal subsidy of $7,000 per space.

NDP families critic Brigitte Sansoucy said the promised future spending on child care is totally inadequate to meet the needs of parents andbelow what her party had proposed in a plan the Liberals attacked for being too slow.

"The Liberals should be supporting child-care programs, such as the one in Quebec," she said. "This budget fails to do that."

Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu said in Quebec, home to the largest subsidized system in the country, and other parts of the country there are long wait lists for spaces, suggesting the need is enormous. The Liberal plan, she said, only amounts to about 40 new child care spaces per riding, per year.

"I'm happy to see them start, but I do think there's a difference between the fanfare that they're making and what actually appeared in terms of dollars in the budget," she said.

Speaking at news conference in Toronto, which hasthe highest child-care costs in the country, Social Development Minister Jean-Yves Duclos said that if the Liberals are going to take gender equity seriously, then they mustdo the same when it comes tothe soaring cost of child care.

Duclos said the Liberals plan to take $95 million from the money announced in the budgetto close data gaps on child care and put $100 million in an innovation fund aimed at finding ways to get the most bang for the government's buck.

Jordan Press, The Canadian Press

Read more:
Liberals plan to spend $195M on research into child care in Canada - rdnewsnow.com

Liberal MP Craig Kelly with Tony Abbott on the backbench during question time. Kelly says Australia should ditch the Paris climate agreement if the US does. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP

Australia will need to review its participation in the Paris agreement on climate change if Donald Trump follows through with his threat to withdraw from the treaty, according to the chair of the Turnbull governments backbench committee on environment and energy.

Craig Kelly told Guardian Australia on Wednesday hed predicted immediately after Trumps election that the Paris climate deal was cactus and he stood by that assessment.

Trump on Tuesday night Australian time signed a new executive order to unravel a number of Barack Obamas regulatory measures to combat climate change, including eliminating the clean power plan, which sets limits on the amount of greenhouse gases that power plants emit.

The latest executive order is seen as a prelude to the US following through with the campaign commitment to withdraw from the Paris deal.

Australian conservatives are watching events in the US closely.

Kelly said he was aware of the new executive order, and if Trump went the extra step and withdrew from the Paris agreement: I think we have to review it.

The former Liberal senator Cory Bernardi, who now sits on the crossbench, holds the same view.

It is clear America intends to withdraw from the Paris agreement and it would be folly for Australia to be part of it, Bernardi said. I dont think we should subsume our national interest to international bodies.

Bernardi this week sparked a rebellion inside the government by proposing to disallow an extradition treaty with China on the basis the countrys legal system was deficient.

The disallowance motion prompted a number of Liberals to express opposition to the extradition treaty.

If Trump withdraws from the Paris deal, Bernardi will likely use the development as a recruitment drive for his new Australian Conservatives movement, which will put pressure on conservative MPs in the government.

Kelly, who chairs the governments backbench committee on climate and energy, has been campaigning internally for months, arguing that the federal renewable energy target should be frozen at its current level.

The Sydney Liberal backbencher said regardless of what the US ultimately did, he had concerns about what the Paris deal could achieve.

Kelly said even if you accepted that fiddling with the CO2 knob could influence climate change, he had doubts that countries could meet their Paris commitments without a technological breakthrough.

Asked whether a majority of his Coalition colleagues would be in favour of quitting the Paris deal in the event Trump pulled out, Kelly argued it would be a close run thing.

He said government MPs were under pressure from voters who believed renewable energy targets were responsible for higher power prices.

The prime minister has signalled Australia will stay the course if the Trump administration follows through with its threats to quit the Paris deal.

Turnbull told reporters last November it would take four years to withdraw from the agreement after ratification.

Read more here:
Conservative Liberals watching Trump's lead on climate, key ... - The Guardian

Over 21,000 people have signed a petition demanding EPA administratorScott Pruitt meet with climate change activist and cult childhood television personality, Bill Nye the science guy.

The petition entitled Time to send Scott Pruitt to climate school. Sit down with Bill Nye the Science Guy ASAP! accuses Pruitt of hypocrisy regarding the issue of climate change and aimsto force him to have a sit-down with Nye.

We are sure Bill can get Administrator Pruitt to hear the truth, despite the political contributions from polluters whispering in his ears.

Bill Nye the Science Guy has helped millions wrestle with challenging scientific concepts, the petition states. Sure, most of those folks were kids watching his popular television show, but we are sure Bill can get Administrator Pruitt to hear the truth, despite the political contributions from polluters whispering in his ears.

The petition itself is remarkable, not just for demanding a Cabinet-level official attend a lecture from a former childrens TV personality, but also for its challenged premise as to why Pruitt needs an education on the issue.

After telling his Senate confirmation panel, I do not believe that climate change is a hoax and that Science tells us the climate is changing and human activity in some matter impacts that change, the head of the EPA (you know, the federal agency charged with limiting greenhouse gas pollution) got enough votes to squeak into power, the petition begins.

After he got the job, the petition continues, he went on CNBC and said: I think that measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do and theres tremendous disagreement about the degree of impact, so no, I would not agree that its a primary contributor to the global warming that we see, referring specifically to the role of CO2 emissions on climate change.

The author of the petition apparently believes that Pruitts comments on CNBC demonstrated hypocrisy or dishonesty in light of his Senate hearing.

What the author and the over 21,000 signatories of the petition miss is someone can believe climate change is real, and that humans play some part in it, while simultaneously holding the opinion that human activity is not the primary cause of climate change. They are not mutually exclusive positions.

Yet the petition maintains that even [Pruitts] agencys website disagrees, stating: Carbon dioxide is the primary greenhouse gas that is contributing to recent climate change.

Acontradiction between the statement and comments Pruitt made on CNBC seems missing.

The EPA statement says only that carbon dioxide is the primary greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change not that it is man-made carbon dioxide that is the primary greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change, or indeed that greenhouse gasses are themselves the primary cause of climate change.

Of course, some may find it of questionable value forthe head of one of the largest government agencies to be educated by a man in possession of a single undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering whose only qualifications as a scientist are portraying one in a childrens program. This speaks volumes about the Lefts current credibility.

The petition crossed the 21,000 signature mark just in time for the Trump administrations announcement Tuesday that the president signed a sweeping executive order significantly reversing the Obama administrations environmental regulations and funding of climate change initiatives.

The action Im taking today will eliminate federal overreach, restore economic freedom, and allow our companies and our workers to thrive, compete, and succeed on a level playing field for the first time in a long time, Trump said.

Link:
Liberals Demand Trump EPA Chief 'Sit Down' with Bill Nye - LifeZette