Archive for March, 2017

News Roundup – Wed, Mar 08, 2017 – The Libya Observer


Middle East Monitor
News Roundup - Wed, Mar 08, 2017
The Libya Observer
Head of the High Council of State, Abdelrahman Al-Sweihli, met with the Turkish Ambassador to Libya, Ahmet Aydn Doan, in Tripoli and discussed the speeding up of the return of Turkish companies to Libya to work on the suspended projects. They also ...
Libya's eastern parliament votes against involvement in dialogueMiddle East Monitor
HoR members attack decision to leave DialogueLibya Herald

all 5 news articles »

See the article here:
News Roundup - Wed, Mar 08, 2017 - The Libya Observer

Is Libya the New Stage for Putin’s Attempted Peacemaking? – CSS Resources (blog)

This article was originally published by IPI Global Observatory on 2 March 2017.

Renewed efforts are now underway to overcome the gridlock in Libyas peace process. The United Nations special representative to Libya, Martin Kobler, and neighboring states are in separate talks with the countrys various factions in an attempt to keep the peace process alive and prevent an escalation of tensions. The latest actor to enter the fray is Russian President Vladimir Putin, who could play a major role in getting key players to remain at the negotiating table.

The UN-brokered Libyan Political Agreement, which aimed to unite rival factions, appeared to be on the verge of collapse late last year. Implementation of the agreement, which was signed in Shirkat, Morocco, in December 2015, had come to a virtual standstill. The Government of National Accord (GNA) established under the agreement and led by Fayez al-Serraj still lacks a legitimate mandate to govern.

The eastern Libyans who dominate the House of Representativesthe countrys sole legitimate parliament under the political agreementreject the GNA on the grounds that its Presidency Council lacks representation from their region. Eastern Libyans also want renegade general Khalifa Haftar as supreme commander of the army, though this decision rests with the Council.

In the meantime, Haftar has used the uncertainty surrounding the political agreement to make further military gains. He has captured several important oil terminals in the northeastern coastal region from forces loyal to the GNA. Gaining control of key infrastructure and allowing oil to be exported under the banner of the National Oil Company has significantly boosted Haftars influence and made his inclusion in the peace process indispensable.

This fact has not been lost on Putin, who has stepped up support for Haftar in recent months. While Russia officially supports the UN-backed GNA, it has often favored the Tobruk government and Haftar. Russian military advisers have reportedly been assisting Haftars forces. Haftar also made several trips to Moscow in the latter half of 2016 and, in January of this year, visited a Russian aircraft carrier as it returned to Russia from Syria. Reports soon emerged of an alleged agreement between Haftar and Putin to establish a Russian naval base off the coast of Benghazi. Putin has also flown injured fighters from Haftars forces to Russia for treatment.

Such close ties to Haftar could give Putin a potentially important role as negotiator in the Libyan crisis. At present, two sets of talks are being pursued. UN envoy Kobler reactivated the UN-led political process after the House of Representatives rejection of the GNA. After three months of discussions with rival factions, he announced in early February that a consensus was emerging on the need to amend the political agreement. This includes addressing the question of leadership of the army, in which Koblernow says Haftar must have a role, and the composition and role of the Presidency Council.

Neighboring states have also conducted talks with parties to the conflict. Reports recently emerged that Libyan factions had agreed to an Egyptian-brokered roadmap for a new political agreement, as well as new parliamentary and presidential elections in 2018. The plan encountered a setback, however, when Haftar pulled out of a meeting scheduled with Serraj in Cairo on February 14, perhaps in an effort to increase leverage. Egypt has since joined Algeria and Tunisia in launching a new round of negotiations.

Russias close ties to Haftar could prove critical in attracting the generalssupport for an amended political agreement, if hecan be convinced that it is his best chance of holding a future position of power. Serraj is expected to travel to Moscow in the days ahead to try to convince Putin to back the regionally brokered deal and act as an intermediary between himself and Haftar, attracting the generalback to the table.

Moscow, however, is unlikely to find the Egyptian deal as it stands satisfactory. Under the roadmap, Haftar would become a commander of the army, but the functions of its supreme commander would be divided between the president of the House of Representatives, the president of the State Council, which advises the GNA, and Serraj, effectively sidelining Haftar in the decision-making process. Moscow has indicated it would ideally like to see supreme command of the armed forces be the responsibility of the countrys leader. Putin is also known to prefer that strongmen in the mold of Haftar fill such roles.

Russian engagement could be critical to both sets of talks now taking place regarding Libya. The danger for the UN may be that Putin, recognizing this, attempts to bring the Libyan stakeholders together on his own, much as hedid with Syria. This would give Moscow much more influence over the terms of a political settlement. Despite its clear support for the Tobruk government and Haftar, Russia has already been reaching out to members of Libyas other factions, including State Council President Abdulrahman Swehli and Presidency Council member Ahmed Maiteq. Reports have also emerged of a Russian delegation visiting the city of Misrata at the time that Haftar toured the aircraft carrier, though it was not publicized at the time. This could have been aimed at establishing contact with powerful Misratan militia leaders, who are also key players in Libyas conflict.

Thus far, Russiasefforts in Libya have failed to bear as much fruit as thosein Syria. Alone, Moscow is unlikely to have enough leverage with all of Libyas domestic stakeholders to nudge them toward a deal. Putin would need to cooperate not just with several key regional players, but also with a number of Western countries that have been heavily engaged in Libya in support of Haftars rivals, not least of which is the United States. The Libyan crisis therefore places further importance on the evolution of the relationship between Putin and US President Donald Trump.

About the Author

Lisa Watanabe is Senior Researcher at the Center for Security Studies at ETH Zurich.

For more information on issues and events that shape our world, please visit our CSS Security Watch Series or browse our Publications.

Save

Save

Save

More here:
Is Libya the New Stage for Putin's Attempted Peacemaking? - CSS Resources (blog)

Banning anthem protests means US Soccer is siding against Black Lives Matter – Washington Post

The Kaepernick Effect spread swiftly through U.S. professional and amateur sports in the weeks after San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick first knelt duringthe national anthem at a football game in August. But only a single pro soccer player U.S. womens national team midfielder Megan Rapinoe chose to join the wave of protests, kneeling before games that the Seattle Reign played and before several U.S. matches. Apparently that didnt sit well with the people who run the U.S. Soccer Federation. Because this week, the U.S. Soccer Federation introduced a new policy designed to keep Rapinoe on her feet. From now on, All persons representing a Federation national team shall stand respectfully during the playing of national anthems at any event in which the Federation is represented.

Those who defend Rapinoes right to kneel point out the irony of telling someone how to observe a song celebrating her freedom of conscience. Its not like Rapinoe is scratching her armpits and making chimp noises, or, as a high school soccer teammate of mine once did, pretending to stretch while relieving herself in the grass. Shes making a principled statement befitting someone who takes seriously what it means to live in the land of the free.

Those who favor the new policy, such asformer mens national team defender-turned-commentator Alexi Lalas, say that playing for the United States is a privilege, so Rapinoe can kneel on her own time, away from the spotlight. Thats not protesting, though; thats yoga. According to this thinking, Rapinoe can either submit to the federation or continue to kneel and face the consequences whatever those turn out to be. The First Amendment wont protect her, either. U.S. Soccer already tells players when to go to sleep, what to eat and how to defend indirect free kicks, so why not this?

As the liberal editor of an American soccer magazine, Ive been watching with interest, because this issue brings the realities of our countrys familiar political divisions to the sport. And althoughI sympathize with the Black Lives Matter movement that inspired Rapinoes protest, I understand why U.S. Soccer would prioritize values such aslove of country and respect for symbols of national unity. Whats more, Rapinoe picked this fight, bravely subverting those values in the service of elevating others that she believes to be more important. She must have known that traditional forces would oppose her.

To me, though, the new policy isnt the story. Rapinoe was already violating a deeply ingrained custom. Now continuing the protest would be officially breaking the rules, not just flouting norms. What interests me about the unanimous decision by U.S. Soccers board of directors is that it verbalized a message that the soccer establishment has been sending to black Americans for decades: This sport is not for you.

[Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: Insulting Colin Kaepernick says more about our patriotism than his]

That might seem harsh. After all, U.S. Soccer has overseen the games tremendous, decades-long growth in the United States, and there are numerous examples of black players who have made their mark for the national team. But the federation has done little to improve the basic model of youth soccer, which ensures that elite clubs are accessible mostly to kids whose families are rich enough to buy entry. There is a swirl of socioeconomic and cultural reasons so few African Americans play our sport, but the bottom line is that soccer requires less equipment than almost any other game and yet in the United States, it is one of the costliest to play.

We most white Americans are not in favor of a justice system that discriminates against black people, but we go about our lives largely indifferent to it. This is Kaepernicks message. As overt racism has waned in the past few decades, indifference has replaced it as the next great barrier to real societal rehabilitation. By kneeling, he forces us to confront that indifference. The participation of a white athlete such asRapinoe gives the protest another dimension. Shes an openly gay professional athlete she has her own battles to fight which makes her kneeling an act of empathy, of imagining a way to expand the boundaries we draw when defining the word we.

Forbidding it is an assertion of indifference. Were not in favor of maintaining structural barriers that keep black kids from playing soccer; were just indifferent to them.

Why has the National Football League, where scores of players joined Kaepernicks protest, not introduced a similar policy? The idea of patriotism is no less ingrained in the mythology of American football. It mayhave something to do with the fact that about70 percent of all pro football players are black. In Major League Soccer, our countrys most diverse sports league, the number is 12 percent. Not a single member of U.S. Soccers board of directors is black. Simply put, African Americans are part of footballs idea of we, but not American soccers.

I suspect that by snuffing out this protest, U.S. Soccer thinks it is escaping from a heated political environment. But the reverse is true. Forcing Rapinoe to stand is itself a political act. Had the federation preserved the right ofindividuals to act according to their beliefs, it could claim neutrality. Instead, it weighed two sets of values that Rapinoe forced into opposition and chose sides.

Youll find that same dynamic on any soccer team a tension between submission to the collective and individual freedom of expression. Lalas knows this well. He used the lessons of his rock-and-roll idols to build a wild-child public persona that surpassed his considerable soccer skills. But he was a center back, a position that requires structure, organization and discipline, and one that ultimately reacts to the gambits of offensive players looking to create. When his coach told him to choose between cutting his hair or being kicked off the national team, out came the shears.

Rapinoe has said she will stop kneeling. But she has the mind of a midfielder, and I hope she uses it to keep imagining things we havent seen before.

Read more:

Why McDonalds and Coca-Cola are the key to cleaning up FIFA

Mexican soccer fans need to stop this homophobic chant

Israel may finally be doing something to stop its most racist soccer fans

Originally posted here:
Banning anthem protests means US Soccer is siding against Black Lives Matter - Washington Post

A dozen arrests during Black Lives Matter protest in Stockton | The … – Sacramento Bee


Sacramento Bee
A dozen arrests during Black Lives Matter protest in Stockton | The ...
Sacramento Bee
Following a Stockton City Council meeting Tuesday night, police say they arrested three men who were part of a Black Lives Matter protest for an alleged assault ...
12 arrested during protests near Stockton City hall - KCRA.comKCRA Sacramento
Police: 12 people arrested during protest at Stockton City Council ...ABC10.com

all 9 news articles »

Continue reading here:
A dozen arrests during Black Lives Matter protest in Stockton | The ... - Sacramento Bee

Spirit rock and the erasure of Black Lives Matter at UConn – UConn Daily Campus

Last Monday, students at the University of Connecticut Storrs Campus were met with a disturbing sight: Frat Lives Matter painted in (appropriately) white paint against a blue backdrop on the school spirit rock. It was soon repainted to read We are #UConn; but nothing could erase the feeling of disgust, disrespect and erasure that black bodies on our campus once again had to undergo at the hands of our more privileged peers. What may be the worst part of this latest slight, however, is that it is not surprising. This is not the first time the rock has been a site of racial tensions.

In fall of 2014, brothers of Pi Kappa Alpha verbally harassed women of Alpha Kappa Alpha at the spirit rock, using racist and sexist language as well as intimidation tactics in an attempt to stop the women from painting over their design. These women stood with strength no one should have to possess as they were called everything but their names, endured the torture of a trial by public opinion and had high-level administrators tell them that their experience was not racist or sexist enough to take action on. Still, no one saw them. When PIKE was later suspended from campus, it was because of hazing, as everyone knows that disrespecting black women is par for the course at UConn. To this day, the university failed to address the use of slurs against the women of AKA, including a faculty member.

This inaction only added to invisibility of black bodies at the university. In spring of 2015, the Resident Assistants for Social Justice Education used the spirit rock to bring light to this invisibility, painting the messages Black Lives Matter and Racism: In Storrs Now. The next day, students woke up to a rock defaced with gold paint covering the words Black and racism. Erasure in its most literal form. I walked around that day wondering if someone would like to erase me with a dash of gold paint.

Here we are again. On the same campus where megaphones are denied at vigils for Michael Brown and women murdered by police officers, a social justice framework used to uplift, affirm and highlight the painful experiences of Black America is being hijacked to bring attention to their lives. They cant seem to stop taking our voices. As if the lives of white frat boys have ever not mattered. As if those boys had to fear for their lives when they were arrested. As if a frat is as much part of someone's identity as the color of their skin. Like youve watched your kinfolk being gunned down like a rabid animal in the street on loop. Like youve watched their blood seep into the Earth that your ancestors toiled for centuries.

It is that deep. It will always be that deep. On a campus, at a rock where black lives have mattered neither to fraternity men nor the people responsible for keeping them in line, it is as deep as an ocean filled with tears of all the mothers and fathers of little black girls and boys taken away before their time. It is an identity erased in gold paint for the comfort of an overgrown toddler who needs everyone to remember that he too, matters. It is an isolated incident being compared to a phenomenon of unarmed black folks being shot, choked and pinned down into hashtags.

It is more than bad taste, you see. You wont let black women into the party that we hear Drake blasting at. You dont go to the protest, but you co-opt the language. You compare six arrests to our executions. Dont you know that a wrongful arrest is the least of our worries? Dont you know we pray for a black boy to be brought in to a precinct and not a coroner's office? To be tried and not mourned?

It is high time for you all to stop coveting things you are not willing to bleed for. Give thanks that you need not remind the world that your life is a life and not a plague to be rid of. Give thanks for your basic human rights, your privilege and your voice. You dont have to say radical things, say nothing if you must, but if youre going to say Lives Matter, you better put Black in front of it.

Continue reading here:
Spirit rock and the erasure of Black Lives Matter at UConn - UConn Daily Campus