Archive for March, 2017

Gaming, NSA Spying, and You: Two Games That Could Change … – The Libertarian Republic

LISTEN TO TLRS LATEST PODCAST:

By: Paul Meekin

Kotaku brought the gameOrwellto my attention today. Its a game about spying on peoples personal data in order to ascertain potential terrorist activity. Your end goal is to thwart that activity. The point of the game, in addition to being an entertaining pot boiler, is the fundamental question of when, and if, its okay to violate the privacy of human beings in order to prevent acts of terror. This is a wonderful concept and one I support fundamentally as a gamer and fan of thinking critically while playing them.

The point of the article was the question if people today even careabout privacy.The most popularcomment on the article?

I dont care. I mean first off what can we do to stop them from spying on us? Nothing. Even if we did complain they could say they stopped but keep on spying anyways.

Outside of that who cares. Let them see my life. My boring facebook posts. My boring emails once and awhile. My youtube watching. Going to Kotaku. Even any porn Ive looked at.

Actually why would you worry about what people see anyways? Unless your hiding something you have no reason to worry. Do you look at child porn? Do you hire hitmen? If not then who cares.

Sorry, I just threw up in my mouth a little.In 2013 we learned the NSA was in our business. Directly or indirectly, the fact of the matter was the NSA was gathering massive amounts of data on Americans, foreigners, and scorned lovers.

Its possible youre much like the commenter above and didnt care. You had nothing to hide and are perfectly okay with invasions of personal privacy and personal data in the name of security.

But its also possible youre a principled individual and dont think the constitution should be violated just in case youre up to no good.

The beauty of Orwellis that it could change your mind one way or another.Unfortunately, as a Mac user, I am unable to play Orwell, but I support it on principle.

A game I did play, that didchange my mind, was Tom ClancysSplinter Cell: Blacklist. Released in August 2013, a few months after the scale and scope of the NSAs activities were revealed.

The backlash to these activities was massive. But along comes Splinter Cell. Without trying and without foreknowledge of this event, it made quite a case in favor of a bit of privacy invasion. Of course the reviewer of the game disregarded the plot as Right Wing mumbo jumbo on a podcast.

But it was mumbo jumbo with a point. Splinter Cell: Blacklist is a game that demonstrates the awesome force of the Military Industrial Complex. From wire tapping to drone strikes to covert operations to warrantless searches and seizures it demonstrated what a single team of highly qualified individuals were capable of when they *werent* restrained by thebureaucracy of the federal government and the morelimiting aspects of the Constitution (and The Bill of Rights in particular).

Obviously it was just a game, and not based on fact although some of the technology is quite believable in hindsight. But the point it makes has real world applications; Just how many times have lives been saved by illegal wire tapping and covert operations we never hear about?Well never know.

How many lives make that violation of privacy worth it? Batman seems to think its about two boatloads.

The Libertarian in me says no lives are worth it. That the fundamental cost of liberty is that the federal government shouldnt be in the business of convicting people for crimes before theyre committed and spying on them, again just in case.

If were willing to violate the privacy of lives to save lives, those lives arent worth as much as we initially thought, are they?

In playing Splinter Cell, you realize America is embroiled in a war with a stacked deck. The enemy doesnt obey the laws of combat. They fight dirty and they fight mean and they behead journalists, use children as suicide bombers, and drag bodies through the street. As a result, if we fight the war as governed by the Geneva convention, were essentially playing checkers while the enemy is playing tackle football.

Games have an amazing capacity to educate while entertaining. Unlike a movie you watch, or a book you read, you participate in a game. And the best of them, from Oregon Trail to Splinter Cell to even Madden Football, can enlighten you on a subject in a way no other media can.

Regarding the NSA? I still dont know how I feel. Theres valid arguments on both sides. I lean toward getting the government out of my computer.

Then again, I have nothing to hide.

-

gamingGeorge OrwellkotakuSplinter CellSpyingvideo games

Follow this link:
Gaming, NSA Spying, and You: Two Games That Could Change ... - The Libertarian Republic

6 best free Linux firewalls of 2017 – TechRadar

Introduction

Note: Our best free Linux firewalls round-up has been fully updated. This feature was first published in June 2010.

You're walking down a dark alley, late at night, when suddenly someone jumps out and forces you to hand over your passport, credit cards, and the keys to your car. This is a decent analogy of what using the internet can be like.

Around every corner lurks danger, and given today's always-on connections, you may have the internet equivalent of burglars without even realising. For the ultimate in computer security, a firewall is similar to having a burly bodyguard walking down the street with you, keeping you safe. Most modern routers have a firewall built in, which while helpful can be difficult to configure.

Fortunately there are also distributions (distros) of the free operating system Linux which have been specifically designed to function as firewalls. These will generally have much more advanced features than those found on a router, and allow you to have far greater control over keeping your personal or business network safe.

In this article, we're going to evaluate six of the most popular free firewall distros. We have tried to emphasise both power and ease of use when considering these offerings and their relative merits. If you want to see all the firewall distros available out there, feel free to visit the DistroWatch website for a comprehensive list.

These distros can either be installed to a physical computer, or if you only have one device, run from a virtual machine. See our guide on setting up a virtual machine in Windows.

Most distros can be downloaded as an ISO file. You can use programs like UNetbootin to copy them to a USB stick and boot. Follow the steps in our guide here to do this.

ClearOS is by far the sleekest looking firewall distro in this roundup. It's obvious that a lot of time and care has gone into developing the interface.

As most firewall distros are written for the stereotypical geek, it's nice to see a refreshing change in what seems to have become the de facto standard of 'cobble it together and think about the interface afterwards'. This said, ClearOS will run quite happily from the command line for more advanced users.

The installation is painless and takes around 10 minutes to complete. You're given the choice to start in Public Server or Gateway mode, depending on how you want to use ClearOS.

Once done, reboot and you'll be given all the info you need to access and administer your new firewall remotely. Everything is straightforward it's obvious that a lot of thought has gone into making ClearOS as easy-to-use as possible.

Once you've completed setup and accessed the web-based admin system, it doesn't take long to familiarise yourself with the various settings and features of ClearOS as the distro provides Getting Started help once you log in to the web interface. Setting up firewall rules is quick and painless, as is much of the other configuration.

The most pertinent feature of ClearOS is its usability, but this distro is about a lot more than just sleek looks. It packs in plenty of features as well not only does it give you a simple, clean way to manage a firewall, but it enables the addition of extra services to your network.

Overall, ClearOS is a powerful distro. As it's available in both free 'Community' and paid 'Professional' versions, it's perfect for both homes and small businesses.

A well thought-out distro that's refreshingly easy-to-use and expands to suit your needs.

This distro, while entirely separate from IPFire, also uses helpful colour-coding to represent different connections. Green is for LAN, red for the internet, orange for DMZ, and blue for wireless clients.

IPCop was originally a fork of Smoothwall (which well cover later) and was in turn forked by the IPFire team as updates to IPCop are few and far between. The most recent version (2.1.9) was released in February 2015.

Installation is relatively straightforward, but there are some wildcard questions thrown into the mix. While these may puzzle the novice user, accepting the default options won't cause any issues unless you have a very specific network configuration. One of the main advantages of IPCop is that the installation image is very small (around 60MB) and can be copied onto a DVD or flash drive.

IPCop's web interface feels clunky, although our tests proved that this was merely psychological, because it was actually incredibly responsive. However, other than the 'real-time' graphs that Smoothwall provides, IPCop gives a lot more information about your LAN setup, and about the running of the firewall itself, including a list of the connections that are currently open.

The Firewall also provides a 'caching proxy', so that you can cache frequently accessed pages locally.

IPCop does a good job as a firewall, giving plenty of information about traffic on your network, and while it might not be the prettiest distro in the world, it does what it's designed to do.

The interface doesn't look great, but this distro protects your network effectively.

OPNsense is an easy-to-use open source firewall based on FreeBSD 10.1 to ensure long-term support. Obviously enough, the projects name is derived from the words 'open' and 'sense', standing for: Open source makes sense.

The OPNsense project started out as a fork of the more established firewall pfSense in January 2015. The team claimed their reasons for forking the project were partly due to the type of licence pfSense used at the time, and partly because they believed they could create a more secure firewall.

The firewall now shares only around 10% of its code with the original pfSense project. Also note that the fork generated quite a lot of controversy between pfSense diehards and OPNsense supporters on Reddit.

OPNsense offers weekly security updates so can respond quickly to threats. It contains many advanced features you'd usually find only in commercial firewalls such as forward caching proxy and intrusion detection. It also supports using OpenVPN.

OPNsense incorporates a very rich GUI written in Phalcon PHP which is a real pleasure to use. Aside from being more appealing than pfSense's interface, OPNsense was created partly due to the fact that the team felt the graphical interface shouldn't have root access, as this can cause security issues.

The GUI has a simple search bar as well as a new System Health module. This module is interactive and provides visual feedback when analysing your network. You can also now export your data in CSV format for further analysis.

The firewall uses an Inline Intrusion Prevention System. This is a powerful form of Deep Packet Inspection whereby instead of merely blocking an IP address or port, OPNsense can inspect individual data packets or connections and stop them before they reach the sender if necessary. OPNsense also offers LibreSSL over OpenSSL.

An excellent and security-minded fork of the original pfSense project that offers a huge array of features.

IPFire is a Linux firewall distro focusing on user-friendliness and easy setup without compromising your security, supporting some useful features such as intrusion detection. IPFire takes a serious approach to security by using an SPI (Stateful Packet Inspection) Firewall built on top of netfilter.

IPFire is specifically designed for people who are new to firewalls and networking, and can be set up in minutes. The installation process allows you to configure your network into different security segments, with each segment being colour-coded. The green segment is a safe area representing all normal clients connected to the local wired network. The red segment represents the internet.

No traffic can pass from red to any other segment unless you have specifically configured it that way in the firewall. The default setup is for a device with two network cards with a red and green segment only. However, during the setup process you can also implement a blue segment for wireless connections and an orange one known as the DMZ for any public servers.

Once setup is complete, you can configure additional options and add-ons through an intuitive web interface.

The ISO image for IPFire is only 160MB in size, so once burned to DVD it'll happily load into your computer's system memory and work from there. Alternatively you can download a flash image to install it to a router or even an image for ARM devices such as the Raspberry Pi.

The IPFire project is in the process of crowdfunding a captive portal. This is perfect if you wish to show people who connect to your Wi-Fi network a landing or login page before connecting directly to the internet. It also prevents rogue devices connecting automatically.

A lightweight and easy-to-use firewall with some super-advanced features.

Like OPNsense, pfSense is based on FreeBSD and designed specifically to work as a firewall and router. As weve mentioned already, the fork between these two projects was controversial and pfSense still has many loyal users. Updates are released quarterly.

This distro runs on a range of hardware but currently only supports x86 architecture. The website has a handy hardware guide to allow you to choose a compatible device.

The installation is done from a command line but its very simple. You can choose to boot from either a CD or USB drive.

The setup assistant will ask you to assign interfaces during the installation, rather than once you've booted to the web interface. You can use the auto-detect feature to work out which network card is which.

The firewall has a small number of built-in features, such as multi-WAN, Dynamic DNS, hardware failover, and different methods of authentication. Unlike IPFire, pfSense already has a feature for a captive portal, whereby all DNS queries can be resolved to a single IP address such as a landing page for a public Wi-Fi hotspot.

This distro has a clean interface and is very smooth to use. Once again, as it's based on BSD, some of the terminology used is confusing, but doesn't take long to get to grips with.

pfSense is possibly the most feature-rich firewall distro out there, but falls down due to a lack of non-firewall-related extra features. If you're just after a simple firewall, you can't go wrong by choosing pfSense, but if you need anything above and beyond that basic functionality, you may want to consider one of the other distros.

The most complete firewall distribution here, but it doesn't come with any non-firewall extras.

Smoothwall Express is probably the most well-known firewall distro. To test this, we did a quick poll of 20 Linux geeks, asking them to name a firewall distro. 19 of them came up with Smoothwall first.

The installation of Smoothwall Express is text-based, but you don't need to be familiar with the Linux console and its all fairly straightforward. You may prefer to download or indeed print out the installation guide to walk you through the setup process. In order to do this you'll need to create a my.smoothwall profile.

There are three installation options: Standard, Developer and Express. Developer is reserved for those people who actually want to work on coding the Smoothwall project. Express is a stripped-down version of Smoothwall which ensures maximum compatibility with older hardware.

Unless you have a very specific network configuration, you can usually accept the default options.

The web-based control panel is simple and easy to understand. Smoothwall Express doesn't provide much in the way of extra features, but does allow you to have a separate account to control the main connection, which is especially useful if you're using dial-up, alongside its caching web proxy service.

One of the benefits of Smoothwall Express is the simplicity it offers when running internal DNS adding a new hostname takes only a few seconds. Assigning static IPs and enabling remote access can also be accomplished with a few mouse clicks.

The only issue we noticed during testing was that assigning static DHCP lease assignments requires you to click Add followed by Save, and it isn't particularly obvious that you have to perform the second step. This led to a fair bit of confusion with our network attached printers jumping from one IP address to another.

A great firewall that's easy-to-use, but it comes up a bit short in terms of more advanced features.

Choosing the right firewall distro is largely dependent on your specific requirements, but whatever they may be, having protection from a firewall is simply a matter of common sense given the multitude of dangers on the internet these days. That said, aside from basic protection, once your firewall is installed it can also be helpful to have a few extra features for good measure.

If you're after a basic firewall, then all of the distros here will do a good job, with some performing better than others. If this sounds like you, you can't go wrong with IPFire, which probably has the easiest setup process.

Failing that, IPCop and Smoothwall Express are excellent options if you're not after anything too complex. If you need a commercial-grade solution and have money to burn, check out Smoothwall's paid-for arm.

If you want something with a small footprint, or to run on an embedded device, pfSense's website contains helpful guides to do this, although it will only run on x86 architectures. For other types of hardware, consider IPFire.

For us, however, a box in the corner that isn't being used to its full extent is a wasted box. This is why we prefer to use virtualisation, whereby the firewall can run as a virtual server on the same hardware you use for web browsing.

While ClearOS remains the most powerful firewall, virtualisation is not as easy as it is with other firewall distros such as IPFire. And this, combined with the fact that IPFire allows easy customisation through its own add-on service Pakfire, means its the narrow winner over ClearOS, receiving our gold medal.

Nevertheless, Smoothwall Express deserves an honourable mention. It's the only firewall that once installed will keep on running with minimal prompting and interference from you. If you ever need to locate specific settings, these are simple to find as well.

More here:
6 best free Linux firewalls of 2017 - TechRadar

‘Stand Your Ground’ Could Get Worse – The New York Times – New York Times


New York Times
'Stand Your Ground' Could Get Worse - The New York Times
New York Times
Republican legislators in Florida are planning to compound the deadly mischief of the state's Stand Your Ground law by allowing accused killers even greater ...
Florida Lawmakers To Vote On Expanding 'Stand Your Ground' Law ...Alabama Public Radio
Pro-Gun Group Not Happy With Latest 'Diluted' Version Of Stand ...WFSU
Florida looks to expand 'stand your ground' immunity | South Florida ...The South Florida Times

all 6 news articles »

Here is the original post:
'Stand Your Ground' Could Get Worse - The New York Times - New York Times

Iowans have mixed opinions on proposed Stand Your Ground gun bill – KCRG

DUBUQUE, Iowa (KCRG-TV9) -- As lawmakers in Iowa debate a proposed Stand Your Ground bill, a Dubuque man says prosecutors may never have charged him for making a citizen's arrest if the proposed "Stand Your Ground" law had been in place. The stand your ground component is part of a bill in the Iowa Senate that would make sweeping changes to Iowa's gun laws.

"I didn't want to shoot that woman. And I am glad I didn't."

Last August, Matt Drake used his gun to force a woman to the ground outside his Dubuque home.

That was after he says he saw the woman attempting to break into the house, through the window. He didn't shoot. However, police say Drake over-reacted.

Prosecutors charged him with assault while displaying a dangerous weapon. In December, he accepted a plea deal for a lesser charge.

"I believe that the county attorney may have thought twice about prosecuting me at the time, had the Stand Your Ground law been in place," said Drake.

Right now under Iowa law, a person must do everything in their power to get away from a dangerous situation, before using deadly force.

Under the proposed Stand Your Ground Bill, a person could use deadly force in self-defense without having to run away first.

"If it's justified. That's the big component," said Dubuque Police Lt. Scott Baxter.

Dubuque police say the definition of justified is open for interpretation. But, if law abiding gun owners are properly trained, police say enforcement shouldn't be an issue.

"They're going to have to explain why they felt threatened what there perceived threat," said Baxter.

The proposed bill worries Regina Hutchinson.

"Anything can be considered a threat. Does that mean if this man is parked in a parking space that I wanted, that I can get out and kill him?" said Hutchinson.

The Dubuque Coalition for Non-violence cites an increase in murder rates in Florida as a reason they're against the Stand Your Ground law.

Researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found after Florida passed that law in 2005, homicide by firearm rates increased almost 41 percent. The authors acknowledged that it's possible there may be multiple factors that led to an increase in the Florida homicide rate.

As for Drake, he thinks a Stand Your Ground law in Iowa would lower crime rates.

"It's a relief that if you're going to defend yourself, you don't have to worry about being prosecuted," said Drake.

Read this article:
Iowans have mixed opinions on proposed Stand Your Ground gun bill - KCRG

‘Stand Your Ground’ Expansion Finds Support in Florida As Other Pro-Gun Bills Fade – The Trace

A memorial for Carlos Garica outside Yaileen Ayala's Florida home. It marks where her ex-husband died after he was shot following an argument with a neighbor. [Photo: Zack Wittman/The Tampa Bay Times via AP]]

A powerful Florida state senator with a top grade from the National Rifle Association has caused a stir this week by publicly opposing much of the groups 2017 state legislative agenda.

The lawmaker, Anitere Flores, a Miami-based Republican, is the upper chambers president pro tempore and a member of the nine-person Judiciary Committee. On Tuesday evening, she announced that she would vote against a slew of bills proposed by a Republican colleague that would have allowed guns on college campuses, and in airports, elementary schools, and other places where they are currently banned.

Throughout my personal, professional, and legislative career I have expressed concerns with the reduction of traditional gun-free zones, she told Sunshine State News. This is not something new nor should it be a surprise to those who follow the legislative process.

Her opposition means that the bills will almost certainly fail to advance through the Judiciary Committee, where Republicans hold five seats to Democrats four.

But the NRA-backed bill with the most documented public safety implications is still alive in the Florida legislature in part because Flores supported it.

Subscribe to receive The Traces daily roundup of important gun news and analysis.

Your signup request was successful. Please consider sharing the Daily Bulletin with your friends and followers.

Close

Lawmakers are considering a bill that would expand Floridas highly controversial stand your ground law. The measure would would require prosecutors to make the case for when a self-defense claim is not valid at a pre-trial hearing. Currently, the burden for making the case for why a claim should be allowed falls to the defense.

It is already difficult to prosecute cases where stand your ground is invoked; opponents of the new law say its language would make such prosecutions all but impossible, and possibly encourage more vigilante justice.

Six weeks ago, on January 24, Flores voted in favor of the bill with her Republican colleagues on the Judiciary Committee, helping to move it to the Senate floor, where it will receive a full vote next week.

Flores did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The existing version of the law was adopted in 2005. It says that people have a right to defend themselves with deadly force so long as they believe they are under grave threat, and are in a place they have a right to be. The law attracted national attention in 2012, after the death of Trayvon Martin. That year, a Tampa Bay Times investigation found that since the statute was first enacted almost 70 percent of those using a stand your ground defense had gone free, and that shooters were much less likely to be convicted if the victim was black. In November of 2016, a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that over the following nine years after Floridas stand your ground law had been implemented, the states gun homicide rate rose by 31.6 percent.

A federal appeals court has thrown out the controversial 'Docs vs. Glocks' law.

by Alex Yablon

The bill amending the law is sponsored by Senator Rob Bradley, a Republican.

What I hope is the outcome of this is something that I hope we all agree on, that people who should not be arrested are not arrested and people who should not go to trial do not go to trial, Bradley told the Orlando Sentinel in January. If I believed that an individual who was otherwise guilty would go free, because this bill passed, then I wouldnt have filed the bill.

The Trace reported in January that Flores is one of two Republicans on the Judiciary Committee who represents a portion of the Miami area, where the NRA has little clout. The city is an outlier in a state where Republicans control both legislative chambers and the governorship. That helps explain Flores opposition to the gun bills under consideration on Tuesday.

The various pieces of legislation, which have received vigorous support from the NRA, would have not only dramatically expanded the number of places gun owners can carry concealed weapons, but would also allow the open carrying of firearms in public.

Last year, a similar version of Bradleys bill cleared the Senate, but died in the House, after Charles McBurney, the Republican chairman of that chambers Judiciary Committee, refused to bring it up for a vote.

McBurney, a lawyer, was finishing out his final term as a lawmaker. He was hoping to receive a judicial appointment to a circuit court in the Jacksonville area, and was a favorite candidate for the job. But then the NRAs Florida lobbyist, Marion Hammer, mounted a campaign against him, inciting thousands of members to email Governor Rick Scott, demanding that he cast McBurney aside.

The campaign was successful, and later, McBurney, who once had an A+ rating from the NRA, wrote an op-ed arguing that the bill had nothing to do with the Second Amendment.

To me, he said, it was a pro-criminal bill.

See more here:
'Stand Your Ground' Expansion Finds Support in Florida As Other Pro-Gun Bills Fade - The Trace