Mediaboss Marketing

Traffic flows past Trump Tower in New York in November 2016. The Trump administration wants more time to produce evidence that then-President Barack Obama ordered surveillance on Donald Trump during last year's election. Trump says his predecessor ordered his "wires tapped" in Trump Tower. Mark Lennihan/AP hide caption

Traffic flows past Trump Tower in New York in November 2016. The Trump administration wants more time to produce evidence that then-President Barack Obama ordered surveillance on Donald Trump during last year's election. Trump says his predecessor ordered his "wires tapped" in Trump Tower.

Updated 6:30 p.m. ET

The Justice Department has asked for more time to respond to a congressional committee about any evidence that President Barack Obama ordered surveillance of then-candidate Donald Trump last year, as Trump has claimed.

The House Intelligence Committee had set the deadline of Monday in a letter to Acting Deputy Attorney General Dana Boente last week in which it asked for proof of the claim, which Obama and others have said is baseless.

Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and ranking Democrat Adam Schiff requested any applications for surveillance of Trump or his associates that were made under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or any court orders supporting such surveillance made by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, NPR's David Welna reports.

David adds that a copy of the letter also was sent to FBI Director James Comey, who has asked the Justice Department to publicly deny President Trump's claims.

The Justice Department issued this statement Monday:

"This afternoon, the Department of Justice placed calls to representatives of the Chairman and Ranking Member of the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence to ask for additional time to review the request in compliance with the governing legal authorities and to determine what if any responsive documents may exist."

The wiretapping claims came as the House Intelligence Committee was already in the process of looking into U.S. allegations that Russia sought to influence last year's presidential election allegations that have also included ties between some in Trump's camp and Russian officials. Nunes has said the panel will also look at the president's accusation.

Sen. John McCain is among those who have asked for proof of Trump's claim, telling CNN on Sunday, "I think the president has one of two choices: either retract or ... provide the information that the American people deserve, because, if his predecessor violated the law, President Obama violated the law, we have got a serious issue here, to say the least."

Monday's deadline came more than a week after Trump said Obama "was tapping my phones in October," in a series of tweets that accused his predecessor of "McCarthyism" and called Obama a "Bad (or sick) guy!"

Trump did not provide any evidence to bolster his claim; instead, the White House released a statement calling for Congress to investigate the allegations made by one president against another.

As NPR's David Folkenflik has reported, Trump's claim is seen as having its origins in a March 2 broadcast by conservative talk radio host Mark Levin, who accused Obama "and his surrogates" of using "intelligence activities to surveil members of the Trump campaign" to help Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. After that, David said, the claim was repeated by the Breitbart website.

"That seems to have inspired, very directly, a series of tweets," Folkenflik said.

Obama spokesman Kevin Lewis says the Obama White House observed a policy against interfering with "any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice."

Lewis added, "As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false."

The morning after Trump made his claim, principal deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was asked about it on ABC's This Week; here's what she said: "Look, I think he is going off of information that he's saying that has led him to believe that this is a very real potential."

Continued here:
Trump Administration Asks For More Time To Provide Proof That ...

WASHINGTON -- The White House has yet to provide any evidence to backPresident Trumps claim that President Obama tapped his phone during the campaign. On Monday, the story changed, with Mr. Trumps spokesman saying the alleged eavesdropping may not have involved a telephone.

President Trump again ignored questions about what evidence he has to back up a week-old claim on twitter that President Obama tapped his phones at Trump Tower.

I think if you look at the presidents tweet, he said very clearly wire-tapping in quotes, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said.

A series of tweets from President Trump allege that former President Obama wire tapped phones at Trump Tower.

CBS Evening News

So, according to Spicer, that could mean any type of surveillance.

Spicer said Mr. Trumps tweets spoke for themselves. The first and second did put wire tapping in quotes but the third and fourth did not -- and the fourth accused Mr. Obama of a crime similar to Watergate, calling him bad and sick.

Spicer said Mr. Trump hasnt directed the Department of Justice to turn over evidence requested by the House Intelligence Committee.

So youre saying Mr. Trump doesnt have an obligation to provide any evidence, CBS News chief White House correspondent Major Garrett asked during Mondays White House press briefing.

No, Im not saying that at all, Spicer said. There is no question there have been an abundance of reports, regarding surveillance and other types of activities that occurred during the 2016 election.

Play Video

The Trump administration faces a deadline Monday to turn over evidence supporting the president's claim that his campaign phones were tapped by f...

Garret followed up saying, That leads us to believe that Mr. Trumps only evidence are these reports?

Spicer responded: No that leads you to believe that.

White House counselor Kellyanne Conway also said she has no evidence of the wiretapping.

There are many ways to surveil each othernow unfortunately, Conway said. There was an article this week that said you can surveil someone through their phones, certainly through their television sets -- any number of different ways microwaves that turn into cameras, etc.

Play Video

John Dickerson, CBS News political director and anchor of "Face the Nation," gives his assessment of President Trump's first 50 days in office an...

In another interview, Conway clarified: Im not Inspector Gadget I dont believe people are using the microwave to spy on the Trump campaign. However, Im not in the job of having evidence.

It appears no one at the White House has that job: The one about providing evidence.

The Justice Department late Monday told CBS News that theyve asked the House Intelligence Committee for more time so it could determine what if any responsive documents may exist.

2017 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Go here to see the original:
New wrinkle on President Trump's claims of Obama wiretapping ...

Long after it seemed the issue of Barack Obamas birthplace was no longer an issue,thanks to his half-brother, the topic is back in the news again.

Malik Obama tweeted a copy of what he claims is a valid birth certificate proving that his half-brother was born not in the USA, but in Mombasa, Kenya.

It is likely that with the tweet, the subject will be picked up again in the fractured world of US politics, where right-wing opponents and conspiracy theorists of the former president have long claimed he was not born in the US.

MORE: Matt Damon was right Growing potatoes on Mars might work

MORE: Statue of ancient Egyptian ruler found in Cairo slum

The message has been re-tweeted more than 12,000 times

The certificate claims that Barack Obama was born in theCoast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, on August 4, 1961. The former president was born in Honolulu and has previously published a birth certificate to show he was born there on August 4, 1961. His birth details were also publishedin the Honolulu Advertiser newspaper.

Barack Obama has published proof of his US birth (Rex)

Malik has reportedly long had a strained relationship with his half-brother and has also publicly backed Donald Trump, one of the biggest voices of the birther movement. He also has accused his half-brother of not doing enough to help his Kenyan relatives.

The US Constitution says that only natural-born citizens can become President. If Barack Obama was born in Kenya, that would have disqualified him from becoming US president.

Malik Obamas tweet (Twitter)

Trump was one of the most prominent backers of the Birther movement who claimed in 2011, when he announced he was thinking of running as president, that he did not believe Obamas claims about being born in the US.

In 2012, he even offered $5 million for charity if Obama could prove where he was born, even though that was a year after Obama had published his long form birth certificate to certify that he was born in the US.

It was only last year that Trump conceded that Obama was born in the US. He then falsely accused Hillary Clinton of being behind the original rumour.

With the Trump administration carrying out attacks recently on Barack Obama, its not impossible that the issue could become sensitive again, despite the proof from the former president and the denial of the issue from the current one

Go here to see the original:
Why has Barack Obama's half-brother raised the "birther ...

The Justice Department on Monday asked lawmakers for more time to gather evidence related to President Trump's claim that former President Obama ordered wiretaps on Trump Tower's phones during last year's presidential campaign.

The House Intelligence Committee said it would give the Justice Department until March 20 to comply.

Current and former administration officials have been unable to provide any evidence of the Obama administration wiretapping Trump Tower, yet the president's aides have been reluctant to publicly contradict their boss.

On "Fox & Friends" this morning, Judge Andrew Napolitano said that even if the Obama administration did spy on Trump, there may never be a way to prove it.

He explained that the statutes allow the president to order the surveillance of any person in the U.S., without suspicion, probable cause or a warrant, but that would leave "fingerprints."

In this case, the alleged surveillance was reportedly ordered in a way that left no record, he said.

"Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command," Napolitano said. "He didn't use the NSA, he didn't use the CIA, he didn't use the FBI, and he didn't use the Department of Justice."

Instead, Napolitano said, Obama usedGCHQ, a British intelligence and security organization that has 24-7 access to the NSA database.

"There's no American fingerprints on this," Napolitano said. "What happened to the guy who ordered this? Resigned three days after Donald Trump was inaugurated."

Editor's Note: The British GCHQ has responded with the following statement: Recent allegations made by media commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano about GCHQ being asked to conduct 'wire tapping' against the then President Elect are nonsense. They are utterly ridiculous and should be ignored.

Buchanan on Trump Campaign & Russia: 'Indict Them or Shut Up'

'When Can We Trust the President?': Spicer Battles Reporter Over Trump Claims

Conway Blasts 'Fake News' Headlines About Her Microwave Spying Remark

View post:
Judge Nap: Obama 'Went Outside Chain of Command,' Used ...

Mick Mulvaney does not have the time to explain how long division works.

Alex Wong/Getty Images

During the 2016 campaign, Donald Trump's go-to tactic for attacking President Obama's economic record was to simply assert that the numbers were all fake. The unemployment rate? It was phony, a fiction, one of the biggest hoaxes in modern politics, Trump suggested. In reality, he told voters, the job market was a disaster.

On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the first jobs report covering President Trump's time in office. It was solidU.S. businesses added 235,000 workers to their payrolls. So, naturally, a reporter decided to ask press secretary Sean Spicer during his afternoon briefing that day whether, given his past statements, Trump thought this jobs report was accurate and a fair way to measure the economyyou know, whether it was still a sham.

Spicer was ready. I talked to the president prior to this, and he said to quote him very clearly, the press secretary said, grinning like a 12-year-old about to win a spelling bee. They may have been phony in the past, but its very real now.

The whole room laughed. Loudly. Then the press conference moved on. It was almost a tender moment. Except the entire White House press corps was chuckling at the president's habit of spreading conspiracy theories about his political opponentssometimes its wiretapping, more often its about unfriendly numbersand then reversing himself once convenient. Apparently, pathological dishonesty is now a winking joke. That's our Trump!

The gag took another soul-crushing turn on Sunday, when White House Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney sat down for an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper. Since the White House was now trumpeting the formerly phony jobs report, Tapper asked whether the Bureau of Labor Statistics had changed its methodology. What followed was an awkward, factually inaccurate attempt at evasion, in which Mulvaney insisted that, while he didn't want to bore the viewers with specifics, the Obama administration was definitely up to something fishy and the Trump administration was most definitely not.

Weve thought for a long timeI didthat the Obama administration was manipulating the numbers in terms of the number of people in the work force to make the unemployment rate, that percentage rate, look smaller than it actually was, Mulvaney said. And we used to tell people back home, the only thing you should really look at, number of jobs created. And as long as that number is above $250,000 [Note: He seems to have meant above 250,000 jobs], then the economy is doing extraordinarily well. And that was the number we hit last week.

Nothing in this garble was true, except perhaps for the fact that Mulvaney might believe his own nonsense. The economy did not add 250,000 jobs in February. More importantly, the Obama administration did not manipulate any percentagesthere are different ways to calculate unemployment and underemployment, some of which are broader than others. The Obama administration reported the same ones as past presidents. The Trump administration is reporting the same exact numbers as Obama, tallied in the same way. The figures haven't even changed much since Trump took officethe official unemployment rate is still 4.7 percent, like it was in December.

In his follow-up question, Tapper almost got Mulvaney to admit so much, before dropping the subject, seemingly out of exhaustion.

And that was it. Lame as his bit about the complexities of long division may have been, Mulvaney was allowed to end on the utterly baseless note that, somehow, the Trump administration was doing something differently, the specifics of which were just too dull for a television audience. And Tapper, typically one of the most aggressive interrogators on television, was content to leave it there as if this is, somehow, a B-level story.

It's not. The idea that Obama was lying about the state of the economy is a keystone in Trump's claim that he is actually making the job market great again. It's a core part of the the administration's narrative. And yet, even good reporters like Tapper barely seem to have the heart to press them on it. The rest have just decided to laugh it off.

Update, March 13, 3:50 p.m.

During Monday's press briefing, a reporter asked Spicer to elaborate on Mulvaney's comments about the unemployment rate. As usual, Spicer's response consisted of barely comprehensible verbal gymnastics. Here they are in full:

Spicer: I think he was clearly referring to Obamacare. [Note: No, he wasn't] With the number of people, but I would refer you back to him and his comments with respect to how he characterized that. I think he can discuss the precise nature of what he meant on that.

Reporter: Does the president think that the Obama administration had been manipulating the unemployment rate.

Spicer: I think you know what the presidents view is. Hes made it very clear in the past what his comments were on how those numbers were, were articulated in the past. I think theres a question between the total number of people that are employed. And the presidents comments in the past have reflected that his big concern was getting to the bottom of how many people are working in this country, and that the denominator, meaning that the percentage rate of the total number of people, is not the most accurate reflection of how many people are employed in this country. How many jobs were creating, how many people are getting back to work, how many companies are committing to hiring more people is a much more accurate assessment of where were heading as a country, where our employment is, where our economy is headed. But to look at a number and say we have 4.7 or 4.8 or 5.9 percent unemployment is not necessarily an accurate reflection of how many people are working, seeking work, or want to work, and if you know how they conduct those surveys, theres a lot of time when a lot of people, whether theyre older or younger or because of how long theyve been searching for work are not considered statistically viable anymore and theyre washed away. So I think how you look at the percentage of people working can sometimes be a manipulated number. The number of people that are added to the rolls every year, every month rather, is a much more accurate understanding of whats happening in the economy.

This is obfuscatory nonsense. One can argue about whether the headline unemployment rate, which Trump has criticized, tells us anything useful about the health of the economy. For what it's worth, I think there are better, more informative stats out there. But the administration has not accused Obama of emphasizing the wrong number. It has accused him of manipulating the numbers, which is a lie. The facts here are simple: The Department of Labor is publishing the same exact statistics it reported under the last administration, tallied the exact same way. But Trump and his underlings refuse to admit that, because it would undercut their message about the economy.

Still, it's good to see that the White House press corps didn't let this issue drop today. Again, it isn't something that should be chuckled away.

Read more:
The White House still insists Obama manipulated the jobs numbers.