Archive for March, 2017

The wider threat still overlooked all roads lead to Communism – BizNews

With all that has happened over the past few days, its incredible to suggest that despite the threat to Treasury there is still a much wider and deeper problem. There are few with the insight that the Institute of Race Relations Anthea Jeffery holds, and what she unpacks in the piece below is most likely the final piece in the ANCs jigsaw puzzle. And the key to her summation goes back to the 1950s when she says the ANC was in effect captured by the SACP, which also highlights why President Jacob Zuma went to them firstwith the news he wants to fire Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan. Jeffery says the end goal is to ultimately create a Communist state, and its all being achieved under the auspices of the National Democratic Revolution. Another brilliant piece of analysis. Stuart Lowman

UPDATE:Cape Messenger editor Donwald Pressly asked Jeffery how SACP deputy secretary general Solly Mapailas press conference on Thursday fitted in with her analysis. He appeared to signal SACP unhappiness with the axing of Pravin Gordhan and Mcebisi Jonas. Also the SACP also has a special meeting in April to decide on the road forward with the ANC/SACP/Cosatu alliance

This is what Dr Jeffery had to say:I think this is just a minor blip.The SACP put Zuma into the ANC presidency in 2007 to help advance the NDR, but now they are concerned that his obvious flaws and close ties to the Guptas are so reducing support for the ANC that the horse theyve successfully ridden into power for two decades might now not win.Hence, theyd like to hold him in check, so as not to turn the electorate still more against the ANC.If they think the ANC has become too hopelessly tarnished, they might perhaps want to distance themselves from the party and they might even seriously consider standing for election in their own right.

But in the end the ANC brand that theyve so assiduously built up for so long is too important for them to jettison, especially as their own electoral support would be very limited. Plus the ANCs growing emphasis on radical economic transformation is exactly what they want. So I expect theyll remain in close alliance with the ANC, no matter how much they might criticise Zuma now (effectively, for weakening the brand). Their key aim will be to influence the succession in favour of someone who can help ensure an ANC victory in 2019 (if necessary, with the help of a deal with the EFF) and who will then continue moving towards the socialist/communist end goal without evoking the public anger that Zuma has unleashed.

By Anthea Jeffery*

President Jacob Zumas peremptoryrecall of finance minister Pravin Gordhan from an investment roadshow in London shows how little Mr Zuma cares about the economy or the plight of the poor.

The president is clearly reckless as to how much his vendetta against Mr Gordhan undermines the countrys growth prospects, pushes up the costs of servicing R2.2 trillion in public debt, or brings closer a ratings downgrade to junk status.

Yet South Africas growth prospects are already very poor. As Africa Confidential reports, South Africa is one of the slowest growing states on the African continent, with a projected growth rate in 2017 of 1.1% of GDP. This is far below the growth rates projected for Ethiopia (8.9%), Cote dIvoire (8.0%), Ghana (7.5%), Tanzania (7.1%), Senegal (6.8%), and Rwanda (6.0%).

Most South Africans are of course rational beings who find it difficult to believe that the government could deliberately undermine the economy and hurt the poor and disadvantaged. Mr Zumas recent conduct shows that his faction of the ANC, at least, has no such concerns.

If the president can act so recklessly against Mr Gordhan at so critical a moment for foreign investor confidence, then expropriation without compensation whether supposedly within the Constitution as now written, or following a constitutional amendment cannot be ruled out.

However, the real problem is much wider and deeper than what Mr Zuma has done this week. Ever since it was captured by the SACP in the 1950s, the ANC has effectively been the junior partner in an alliance aimed at the gradual crippling of the capitalist economy in pursuit of a socialist and then communist order. This is being achieved under the rubric of the national democratic revolution (NDR), to which the ANC plans to recommit itself in December this year and which the SACP openly describes as offering the most direct path to communism.

The ANC has long downplayed this objective, for it knows that any open acknowledgement of this goal would greatly weaken its popular support. Most South Africans have no wish to adopt the flawed ideology and centralised controls that so signally failed in the Soviet Union and eastern Europe. Rather, they want to retain the political and economic freedoms that the ending of apartheid ushered in.

To disguise their real goals, the ANC and its communist allies have long been masters of propaganda: the constant repetition of a narrative which includes key elements of truth that give it credibility, but which nevertheless profoundly distorts reality. This narrative shifts according to the needs of the time, but it always includes a careful choice of culprits to help deflect attention from the ANCs own agency.

In the ten years (1984 to 1994) of the ANCs peoples war against its black rivals, the key culprits in the narrative were initially Inkatha warlords and impis in KwaZulu/Natal and later a sinister Third Force made up of Inkatha and the South African Police. Both Inkatha and the police were of course to blame for many of the killings in this period. However, the narrative was also utterly misleading in obscuring the ANCs own major role in the deaths of some 20,500 black civilians.

Once the peoples war had brought the ANC to power in 1994, political violence came to an end and the narrative shifted once again. To increase the states control, weaken the economy, and prepare the way for ever more racial scapegoating, the narrative then targeted the commercial farming sector, the mines, the banks, the private health care sector, the supposedly white-owned media, and the many businesses (which despite the huge sums put into BEE and the practical obstacles to its success) had reportedly been dragging their feet on transformation.

Now that ANC/SACP policies have done so much to reduce growth, increase unemployment, and frustrate hopes of a better life for the poor, the ruling party is gearing up to fetter the economy still more firmly. It now wants radical economic transformation to change the structure of the economy. It is also seeking to push the BEE ownership requirement up from 25% to 51%, and is increasingly echoing EFF calls for the nationalisation of land and other assets.

Not surprisingly, the dominant narrative has now shifted once again. Its current targets have expanded from the specific sectors listed above to include racism, colonialism, and white monopoly capitalism. Increasingly, these factors are identified as the key reasons for economic malaise and worsening destitution. Moreover, as so often in the past, there are many commentators outside the ANC who uncritically endorse and echo this narrative and seek to punish those who step outside its limits.

This narrative is helping to prepare the way for ever more state ownership and control. It is also damaging the economy in other ways, by raising racial tensions and eroding the social trust vital to investment. At the same time, it is calculated to play a particularly useful role in demonising the DA and shoring up the ANCs failing support in the run-up to the 2019 general election.

What Mr Zuma has done in recalling Mr Gordhan from London is so obviously damaging that many South Africans will rally to the finance ministers defence. They might even persuade Mr Zuma not to go ahead with his proposed cabinet reshuffle. But the wider threat to the country from the ANC/SACP alliance and its NDR objectives generates little opposition because it is still so little understood.

The current narrative is thus likely to continue unchecked. So too will the impetus towards the radical economic interventions which the narrative legitimates. In time, the weakening of property rights and increased racial scapegoating will help to marginalise or drive out the established middle class. This in turn will greatly weaken the new middle class. It will also (if all goes to plan) culminate in a proletarian dictatorship under the incontestable control of the ANC/SACP alliance. This, as the ANC coyly puts it in its draft Strategy & Tactics document for 2017, will help to usher in a higher form of human civilisation.

Follow this link:
The wider threat still overlooked all roads lead to Communism - BizNews

Nobody Trusts The Process More Than America’s Most Prominent Young Socialists – Deadspin

In April of last year, Philadelphia right-wing talk radio host and Daily News columnist Dom Giordano cooked up a hot take comparing now former Philadelphia 76ers general manager Sam Hinkie to Bernie Sanders. It ended with an almost Breitbartian non sequitur: Hinkie robbed area basketball fans of three years of competitive basketball. If elected, Sanders would rob us of a lot more.

This is a classic hack columnist move: Here are two things I dont like, therefore they are the same. But Hinkies Process is antithetical to socialism. Its strategies explicitly are copied from banks, which Hinkie openly admires; its actual basketball players are treated like widgets. (Hollis Thompson was the only Sixer on the roster for the duration of the Process, and he was waived this season.) It doesnt get less socialist than Stanford Graduate School of Business, from which Hinkie graduated and which shouldve been shuttered after Hinkies insane resignation letter. In short, Giordanos take is dumb as shit.

Except: Many of Americas ascendant socialists also are ardent Process Trusters. The Philadelphia chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America is filled with Hinkie fans; heres a sign from an anti-Trump rally in Philly saying Trust The Process, Not The President. Heres Bernie Sanders policy staffer Billy Gendell copping to being a TTPer. And no one Ts the P more than Larry Website, who chairs the Central Jersey chapter of the DSA and does recruiting and outreach for DSA national. Hes tweeted some variant of his faith in Hinkie dozens of times already this year.

I asked Jacobin magazine editor, publisher, and founder (and Knicks fan) Bhaskar Sunkara why socialist NBA fans were so quick to embrace a disastrous strategy of losing basketball games on purpose that was ostensibly based on investment banking. Sunkara said that he doesnt want the Knicks to tankthat as a basketball fan, and as a socialist, I actually do believe in winning any reforms you can get today in the here and now ... Id rather take that two-percent chance that the Knicks get the eight seed and win it all than [have] a lottery pick.

But Sunkara loves the ideas that surround Hinkies failed team-building on several levels. I feel like the tagline for Jacobin should be Trust the Process, he told me. There is something about the slogan itself that resonates with me as a socialist. The struggle is ahead. Us trying to carve out a space in American politics for socialist ideas, in the long term trying to build an opposition movement that could hopefully one day, decades down the road, contend for power, requires a very patient strategy. And our time horizon extends way beyond next season, or next year.

This was the part of Hinkies strategy that bought him (and many failed GMs before him) years and years of job security: If were not trying to win right now, you cant judge me on the outcomes on the court. You just have to trust the process. This is bullshit out of the mouth of a man trying to lose basketball games on purpose; it rings truer when Bernie Sanders says that a political revolution is required before democratic socialism can be realized. But Sanders also is fighting like hell to win contests in the current conditions. Like Lenin (and Steve Bannon), Hinkie wanted to heighten the contradictions so he could rebuild after a total collapse.

Sunkara accurately identified a reason why Hinkie was able to attract so many fans, and its one that tracks pretty well with why Trump was able to beat Clinton in November. He prefers the Hinkie-era Sixers to the rudderless Knicks: People are like I dont mind what my team is doing, because at least it seems like they have a plan. Compare that to the Knicks in the Isiah Thomas era where it was like, Oh god, no one knows what theyre doing. Or even right now, our front office has gone back to that, where no one has a plan.

Analyses of the Trump and Clinton campaigns found that 25 percent of Clintons ads focused on policy; inasmuch as Trump had policies, 70 percent of his ads did. Announcing that you have a terrible plan and are sticking to it no matter what is more persuasive than seeming to have none.

Sunkara is glad that the Philly DSA is filled with Hinkie Bros. What I like about the Philly DSA using Trust the Process often is that it shows that DSA is now an organization filled with lots of young people who have pretty normal pursuits and interests. One pretty common interest among a lot of people in DSA is watching the NBA, which is what it would be for a broad group of people from their early 20s to their early 30swhich a lot of DSA members are.

A lot of its purpose is kind of a signal that were not just complete wackos. Were committed to a political purpose but its not the only thing we do in life. This is not dissimilar to the thinking that leads to the Democrats trotting out a phalanx of celebrities at their conventionLook, youths, we are cool!except that for a still relatively obscure and small (still less than 20,000 members) leftist party, it might actually help.

The pseudonymous Larry Website needs no such second-order rationalization of his Hinkie fandom. For Website, leftism and Process Trusting go hand in hand; he rejects Sunkaras incrementalism on and off the court. It taps into the political sphere in that, how many times can you try reformism? At some point, youre just like, this isnt working, and you need to try more radical ideas to try to win. Trying reformism and trying to do the bare minimum isnt working for the left or the Sixers.

Okay, sure, fine. I hated the post-Iverson Sixers; I cant stand Hillary Clinton, though I better admit right here that I supported her in the Democratic primary before coming to regret it deeply. But just because incrementalism is shitty politics doesnt mean its a bad way to run a basketball team. Id trade the last four years of non-basketball to be a fucking Bucks fan right now. Centrist politicians are who they are and will never radically convert to class-warfare politics. But a basketball team can hang around the playoff mid-pack for a few years while also positioning itself to jump to title contention with one big acquisition. Just ask the Houston Rockets.

And again, Hinkie is an archetypal Silicon Valley techno-libertarian. When I asked Website about that, he agreed, saying, Dont get me wrong, hes a horrible person. Like in his work life, hes a horrible person. But hes the one who was finally brave enoughin his terrible ruling-class kind of wayto be the first one to take a jump at this. And Website points out that even if Hinkie is of the ruling class, he was ultimately rejected by it when the NBA pushed him out for the Colangelos.

For me, its like, hes more of a class traitor in that hes willing just to fuck shit up. The Kings ownership are the ones who really make you wonderare these really the smartest people in our society making these decisions? The Kings, I mean man, a lot of these people fail upwards.

(Quick hilarious note here: the Kings reportedly are interested in hiring Hinkie. Website made that comment three weeks before news of their interest broke. Back to Larry.)

He definitely made enemies among that ruling class that we loathe, and he got replaced by someone that I equally despise. Some people take it too far in the way that they idealize him, but he was the one who was the one who was willing to actually do it.

I appreciate him for that, but in all other aspects, definitely not a fan. There are a lot of historic class traitors. FDR, he was mobilizing the working class; Hinkie was tapping into a rage that Sixers fans felt across the board. Theres something there. Even still, the Sixers are a horribly capitalist team. The Wells Fargo Center is still the name.

Website has been a radical acolyte of the Process since he learned about former Sixers center Andrew Bynum driving away from a gas station in his Ferrari with the nozzle and hose still attached. That was when I was like, Im fuckin done, the Sixers can do whatever. When I asked him if there was ever a moment in his political life if he had patience for reformism, he says that he was a pretty big Obama supporter when he first got elected.

Like Steve Bannons, Websites political views were hardened in the crucible of his dads finances getting ruined in 2008. The realization that the Obama administration wouldnt be arresting any bankers for their role in that years economic collapse was Websites political version of Bynum driving away with the gas pump flopping in the street.

The difference is in their respective conclusions: Bannon famously views the future apocalyptically; Website, as is maybe temperamentally required for a Process Truster, is an optimist. He will not be content to go for the six seed: The static complacency of neoliberalism extends to the basketball sphere as well. We can do so much better than this; we just have to find radical alternatives to do this.

Preferring Hinkies radical approach over Democratic-style incrementalism is, essentially, an aesthetic preference. But pro basketball is not just a simulation of socialisms concerns; its a real industry with real management and a real unionized labor force. And more than just Hinkies credentials and style match up neatly with investment bankers; his practices do, too.

The Process, at bottom, is a suite of business practices designed to exploit the NBAs most management-friendly features, most especially the draft lottery and rookie wage scalemeasures that rob new workers of negotiating power and self-determination, and artificially cap their pay at a tiny fraction of their worth for what can end up being the first five years of their careers. The Sixers under Hinkie rarely and only grudgingly exceeded the collectively bargained salary floor; in tandem with the NBAs effective monopoly on pro basketball in the United States, the Sixers (ongoing) effective withdrawal from the market for the kinds of players who might help them win games shrinks the pool of jobs available for those players. And for years the Sixers have subjected young, unqualified workers to miserable public failure at the beginning of their careers for a benefit that, if it ever arrives, would be realized by their replacements.

This is all stuff that is counter to socialist values, obviously. When I pressed Sunkara and Website on this, both of them conceded that while they were intoxicated by Hinkies radicalism, its execution left something wanting.

Sunkara supports a pursuit of sabermetric efficiency, but not at the expense of workers. Socialists are for rationality and scientific management, but to what end? If theres a technique that could improve productivity in a workplace by 20 percent, I would say that in my vision of a socialist society, that technique would be employed. But then workers would have the chance to either get paid more or take time off. So the gains of this productivity advantage isnt just going to a couple people, but is more broadly shared.

Website compares the Sixers procession of cheap second-rounders and other obscurities to any other profession exploited by capital: Some of the playersand this goes back to alienation, and the disposable labor that Marx talked aboutare just lucky to get in the league. And some of the players have that mentality where theyre like, Im just happy to be in the NBA.

Some people would use the same language, like, Im just happy to be a miner. These players are remarkably disposable, but also, they deserve to get paid for their labor. He also added that the way they churn players through bothered him.

Both men displayed a desire to #sticktosports that was surprising to me, but maybe when politics is your full-time gig, finding it in sports is less interesting. I like sports enough where I dont like mixing it with politics, Sunkara told me. Theres certain people, I wont name them, that specialize in that kind of stuff. [Being a sports fan] is what I do in my free time, and I try not to find like hidden acts of resistance on the court at every corner.

Website was less sanguine about it, saying that rooting for the Sixers wasnt the most evil thing in which he actively participates: There can be no ethical consumption under late capitalism, so these are the compromises we have to make every day. When we go shopping at the food store, were making compromises, when we go to the gas station, were making compromises.

To put it all on something like basketball that brings to joy to my lifethe community around the Sixers is everything that is good about the world and that sense of solidarity and that were all in this together riding through it with the Sixers but then also in real life, that community, Ive met some amazing people. That is what is good. If this sense of solidarity excludes the workers providing the community its identity, well.

Website and I spoke just after the news broke that rookie center Joel Embiid, the jewel of the Process so far, would miss the rest of the season, but before the more recent news that Embiids knee would require surgery. Embiids play thrilled us both, but even the much sunnier Website was aware that any revolutionary project teeters on collapse. He compared the Process to the doomed Paris Commune that ruled the city for two months in 1871: The fragility of this project, of the revolutionary transformation of the Sixers, it is like a shot in the dark. And it can fall apart at any second.

Maybe the Sixers will never make it past or even back to mediocrity. Maybe the weirdest possible outcome of the Process would be turning the team into the American version of the Bundesligas FC St. Pauli soccer team, whom the Guardian called in 2015 the club that stands for all the right things ... except winning. Website points to European soccer teams like Livorno, whose support is deeply tied to militant communism.

Perhaps this will be the Processs legacy: making this eternally hapless franchise the unofficial team of an American socialist party, forever undermining one of the most visible unionized labor forces in the country but beloved by rose-handled internet leftists everywhere. At the moment, its a destiny that seems nearer than a championship; Id like to think that Sam Hinkie, neoliberal scum, would hate it.

Dennis Young is an editor at FloTrack with a bad twitter account.

Excerpt from:
Nobody Trusts The Process More Than America's Most Prominent Young Socialists - Deadspin

Seattle Socialism Conference Aims To Capitalize On Anti-Trump … – Patch.com


Patch.com
Seattle Socialism Conference Aims To Capitalize On Anti-Trump ...
Patch.com
Seattle, WA - A gathering of local socialist groups at UW on Sunday is aiming to attract new and existing members from around Puget Sound.

and more »

Continue reading here:
Seattle Socialism Conference Aims To Capitalize On Anti-Trump ... - Patch.com

‘How socialism ruined my country’: Brazilian journalist has eye-opening message for America’s youth – BizPac Review

Bernie Sanders is back in the Senate yammering about Russians and the minimum wage, but if things had gone even a little differently he might very well have become president. And there are still millions of young people who supported the outspoken socialist and would gladly support Sanders or another candidate with similar beliefs in 2020.

So, is Sanders right? Would we be better off under socialism? Fortunately, life provides opportunities to learn from the mistakes of others, and journalist and Veja magazine columnist Felipe Moura Brasil provides a wonderful but terrifying analysis of how socialism has affected his country.

A Brazilian journalist recounts how socialism and the promise of income equality and social justice ruined his country. He takes particular issue with Americas youth who are blindly enamored with the same message and voted forBernie Sanders.

Watch this eye-opening video from PragerU and share it with your friends, particularly the ones who are still feeling the Bern. Its strong medicine, but it could be just the kind they need.

Schumer makes loud scene; interrupts meal to Trump-shame patron at posh NYC restaurant, witness says

Op-ed views and opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of BizPac Review.

Wake up right! Receive our free morning news blastHERE

See original here:
'How socialism ruined my country': Brazilian journalist has eye-opening message for America's youth - BizPac Review

Ohio tea party to Trump: Stop attacking conservatives – Cincinnati.com

President Trump answers reporters' questions in the Oval Office on March 30, 2017.(Photo: Chip Somodevilla, Pool/European Pressphoto Agency)

WASHINGTON More than a dozen of Ohios leading conservative activists fired off a letter to President Trump on Thursday asking him to back off his attacks on the House Freedom Caucus.

The letter, from 20 tea party leaders and Republican stalwarts across Ohio, came after Trump publicly threatened todefeat members of the Freedom Caucusin the 2018 midtermelections. The Freedom Caucus is a group of about three dozen arch-conservatives in the House, including Rep. Jim Jordan of Urbana.

We respectfully ask you to stand with our conservative heroes in the Freedom Caucus,along with other conservatives in the House and Senate, the Ohio contingent wrote in their letter. Please workwithmembers of the Freedom Caucus, notagainstthem.

Among those signing the letter wereAnn Becker, president of theCincinnati Tea Party, and Lori Viars, vice president of Warren County Right To Life.

Trump attacked the Freedom Caucus lawmakers after they helped torpedo the GOP Obamacare repeal bill last week, which the president and House GOP leaders had championed as their best chance to kill the 2010 Affordable Care Act. Trump's jab raised the specterof a bruising internal GOP fight.

We felt he was going a little bit too far, Tom Zawistowski, of the Portage County TEA Party,said of Trumps threat. He said the Freedom Caucus saved the president from a bill that would have been an albatross around his neck.

We just think maybe hes putting some blame where he should putting some thanks, he said.

The letter, while politely worded, signals that conservatives will not sit quietly on the sidelines if Trump abandons hard-core GOP principals and takes a more pragmatic route that involves working with Democrats.

Read more:

Trump threatens House Freedom Caucus, says it needs to 'get on the team'

What is the House Freedom Caucus and why is Trump attacking its members?

Republican moderates reject talks with House Freedom Caucus

Here is the full letter and the list of signers:

Open Letter to President Trump from Ohio conservative leaders

Dear Mr. President,

We, the undersigned conservative leaders in the swing state of Ohio, voted for you and worked hard to bring others to the polls to elect you last November. We want to see you succeed in Making America Great Again! We appreciate much of what you have already done in the first few months of your administration.

However, we respectfully ask you to stand with our conservative heroes in the Freedom Caucus,along with other conservatives in the House and Senate.These patriotsare working to keep the campaign promises that you and they made tous.

Please workwithmembers of the Freedom Caucus, notagainstthem, to ensure you are all successful in keeping your campaign promises and "draining the swamp." Mr. President, we are praying for your success as you work to rebuild our nation.

Respectfully,

Ann Becker, Butler County for Trump co-chair; Cincinnati Tea Party president; GOP State Central Committee member

Tom Zawistowski,"We the People" Convention president; Portage County TEA Party

Janet Folger Porter,Faith2Action president; Trump general election volunteer

State Rep. Candice Keller,Butler County Trump volunteer; Ohio House Dist. 53

State Rep. Nino Vitale,Ohio House Dist. 85 (Champaign, Shelby & Logan Co.)

Kirsten Hill,Ohio Liberty Coalition president

Mike Lyons,Ohio Liberty Coalition board member

State Rep. Paul Zeltwanger,Ohio House District 54 (Warren, Hamilton & Butler Co.)

John McAvoy,Toledo Tea Party president

State Rep. John Becker,Ohio House District 65 (Clermont Co.)

Terri Iannetta,Summit County Tea Party president

Jim Green,North Central Ohio Conservatives, Inc. president

Mary Ellen Buechter,Miami County Liberty vice-president

Jim & Jennifer Hiles,Hocking Hill TEA Party Patriots co-founders

Jeff Malek,Medina TEA Party Patriots president

Anne Kaczmarek,Liberty Camp for Kids president

Barbara Burkard,Miami Valley Citizens Info

T.J. Honerlaw,Warren Co. Republican Party Central Committee

Lisa Cooper,Republican State Central Committee, District 26tee vice-chairman; Trump general election volunteer

Lori Viars,Conservative Republican Leadership Committee board member; Trump Campaign general election volunteer; Warren Co. Right To Life vice-president

Read or Share this story: http://cin.ci/2oEg37o

Read more:
Ohio tea party to Trump: Stop attacking conservatives - Cincinnati.com