Archive for March, 2017

How to get into Heaven (And why progressives like Satan) Jim … – New Jersey 101.5 FM Radio

Subscribe to New Jersey 101.5 FM on

Theres one sure-fire way to get into heaven . but itll cost you, Jim Gearhart reminds us in the latest installment of his new podcast, The Jim Gearhart Show.

Ever since his return to New Jersey 101.5, Jims been thinking a lot about the progressive movement and its response to president Donald Trump. And while he thinks liberalism is a perfectly valid way of thinking about the world, progressivism, he says, is something altogether and even dangerous. In fact, he says,the progressives remind him of a certain devlisih figure.

The clip above is justpart of the latest episodeof the new Jim Gearhart Show podcast to get the full thing, subscribe with your favorite podcasting app for iPhones, Android devices or your computer:

Get The Jim Gearhart Show on Google Play

Get Jim on iTunes

Love podcasts? Also check out Forever 39, Annette and Megans new podcast about turning 40 and loving life along the way. This week, they remind us: Youve only got 7 seconds to make a first impression. Guess what they notice first?

More from Jim Gearhart:

Subscribe to New Jersey 101.5 FM on

Follow this link:
How to get into Heaven (And why progressives like Satan) Jim ... - New Jersey 101.5 FM Radio

Letter to the Editor: Carlucci and the IDC are Not Progressives – Patch.com


Patch.com
Letter to the Editor: Carlucci and the IDC are Not Progressives
Patch.com
On Saturday, March 25th at 11 am at the Rockland County Courthouse in New City, we will mourn the death of bills that never saw the light of day because the Senator Carlucci and the IDC, though calling themselves progressives, can't see fit to support ...

and more »

See more here:
Letter to the Editor: Carlucci and the IDC are Not Progressives - Patch.com

In Donald Trump, progressives see their hypocrisies laid bare – CBC.ca

Two months into Donald Trump's presidency and opposition remains at a fever pitch. This permanent state of apoplexy is somewhat strange, however, given that Trump's actions the generous use of executive orders or cherry-picking media for off-the-record gaggles, for example all echo those of his predecessors. Albeit, with far more bombast.

But neither his bluster, nor even necessarily the content of his policies, explain such strident opposition to America's 45th president. Instead, it may be that, in Trump, critics and the media see their own failings and hypocrisies laid bare a twist of the knife that generates opposition more fervent than a President Cruz or Rubio might've encountered.

Theearly policy setbacksTrump has experienced anembarrassing defeaton Friday with his health care plan, following on the heels of having his second consecutive immigration executive orderblockedby the courts belie the sea of change that occurred inAmerican politics with his election. In just a few short months,Trump's rough and tumble way of doing businesshas done more to upend the established political order than progressives have in the past 30 years.

Take, for example, the Trump administration's very public feud with the U.S. intelligence agency. A frequent lightning rod for criticism especially given the "oopsies" over Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and torture scandals the intelligence community has largely skated in the past with the help of pliant or otherwise ineffectual Republican and Democratic White House leadership.

With Trump, however, the intelligence community is experiencing significant pushback and criticism, and the president haseven gone so far as to compare them toNazi Germany. Indeed, Trump's attempt to bring the CIA to heel is the stuff progressives only wish their politicians were capable of.

Trump's generous use of executive orders echoes that of his predecessors. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)

Then, there's another target of persistent progressive criticism: the insidious influence of big money in U.S. politics, particularly in presidential races.

The reflexively invoked "Citizens United" case is frequently cited as allowing corporate and union money to pervert the course of American political life. Yet it was liberal Hillary Clinton who was chasing down every Wall Street dollar she could for an ultimate campaign expenditure of $1.2 billion.

Clinton's ultimate campaign expenditure was a whopping $1.2 billion. (Elizabeth Shafiroff/Reuters)

Republican Trump's comparatively paltry Wall Street fundraising and total spending was just $616 million a pittance in modern presidential races and a bitter pill for progressives to swallow. It was "poor Donald," of all people, who publicly took on the likes of the Koch Brothers and knocked back deep-pocketed political interests. How uncomfortable.

The media is also experiencing this sort of embarrassing existential discomfort.

After eight years of trashing a rather docile President George W. Bush who stated in his book Decision Points that he felt mixing it up with the media was beneath the office of the president the media slipped a little too comfortably into the role of cheerleader for the Obama administration. Indeed, when the Obama administration like administrations before it conducted off-the-record gaggles and backgrounds with hand-picked media, there was hardly a peep from journalists.

And when the Obama administration named journalist James Rosen as a criminal co-conspirator in an investigation into State Department leaks about North Korea,and used the Espionage Act to obtain warrants for Rosen's phone records and those of his parents, the broader press reaction was muted, at best.

But when Trump sends out a mean tweet about CNN? Suddenly the very foundation of the First Amendment is under siege. With the furor surrounding Trump's decision to break tradition and not call on the AP first at press conferences, one would think he had just subpoenaed two months' worth of the AP's phone records.

There is hypocrisy flying around in other areas, too. Liberal publications long critical of the CIA, particularly for its actions in Latin America, are now suddenly seized by the idea that America needs a strong and independent intelligence community.

Presidential candidate Mitt Romney was mocked over his warnings about Russia. (Rogelio V. Solis/Associated Press)

Critics and pundits who openly mocked Mitt Romney over his characterization of Russia as America's number one geopolitical foe have all now seemingly rediscovered their membership cards to the John Birch Society. Of course, by that same token, conservative news outlets that traditionally pray at the altar of Reagan now find themselves taking a more conciliatory approach to Russia.

For a political neophyte, Trump causes considerable consternation. For his politics, yes, but also for what he and his actions represent.

Trump has single-handedly accomplished what decades' worth of politicians progressive and conservative alike could not, and has knocked a self-absorbed media down a peg. There is the uncomfortable realization that taking on the intelligence community or eschewing big money donors was possible all along, but establishment politicians had no such interest in doing so. It took a blustering Manhattan amateur to upend America's political order, the result of which is exposing the crushed hopes and hypocrisy of his rivals.

This column is part of CBC'sOpinion section.For more information about this section, please read thiseditor'sblogandourFAQ.

More here:
In Donald Trump, progressives see their hypocrisies laid bare - CBC.ca

Progressives find their voice in SLO County – The San Luis Obispo Tribune


The San Luis Obispo Tribune
Progressives find their voice in SLO County
The San Luis Obispo Tribune
On a rainy morning in San Luis Obispo, I met with Nick Andre of SLO Progressives, a group that emerged from Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign. Prior to the meeting, I'd imagined him as a starry-eyed idealist. Instead, Nick turned out to be a ...

View original post here:
Progressives find their voice in SLO County - The San Luis Obispo Tribune

Liberals must sell budget to premiers after ‘challenging’ health talks – CBC.ca

Liberal MPs stuck around Ottawa on a rareSaturdayto hammer out a plan to sell their recent budget to the public in the coming weeks, but the government also will have to move past the bruising experienced during the health accord negotiations to get the premiers onboard.

To deliveron some of the touchstone pledges of their financial plan, including social housing and child care spaces,Prime Minister Justin Trudeauand Finance MinisterBill Morneau will need provincial and territorial support.

Whenasked if the federal-provincial relationshipwas marred by the Liberal's approach of making individual deals with the provinces on health,MorneautoldCBC'sThe Housethe collaboration is never going to be simple.

"It's always going to be a challenge to work togetherbecause we're not going to have exactly the same view on every single issue," he said.

"They're working to provide really positivesituations for people in their provinces;we're working towards the same goal."

Already some established irritants for the federal government have led to less-than-stellar reviews of the budget.

Quebec came out swinging on Wednesday, saying theLiberals failed to show that they would supportseveral major infrastructure projects.

"We are extremely disappointed and concerned that there's no clear signal in this budget regardingthe great infrastructure projects that are the rapid bus system in Quebec City, the Blue Line of the Montreal Metro and the electric train in Montreal," said Quebec Treasury Board President Pierre Moreauin astatement in French.

Quebec Treasury Board President Pierre Moreau, right, said the 39 Quebec MPs in the Liberal caucus should be speaking in favour of the three major infrastructure projects in Quebec and Montreal not mentioned in the budget. (Radio-Canada)

"If there's a failure, it's on the federal part. They should have been there...but they were not."

Heading into his second day of caucus meetings, Infrastructure Minister Amarjeet Sohi responded, saying he has avery strong relationship with Quebec ministers.

"We understand these are their priorities and those are the priorities of our government as well. And we are working closely with them," he said.

"I think Ottawa is the last place you want to have dictating local governments how they make their decisions."

Manitoba PremierBrianPallister, who still hasn't signed a health deal with the federal government, said hewas "not displeased" by the budget's commitment to funding for Indigenous health but said he was disappointed with no additional money to deal with asylum seekers coming to his province.

"Talk of continuing previously announced programs is not recognition of the growing concerns I think many Canadians have about the need for better partnership to protect asylum seekers," he said.

Pallisterhas also repeatedly said he will not continue negotiations with Ottawa until he sees in writing that the threat to remove the $60 million earmarked for the Factory of the Future project is off the table.

Finance Minister Bill Morneau and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau leave the Prime Minister's office holding copies of the federal budget on Wednesday. (The Canadian Press / Sean Kilpatrick)

A spokesperson for the premier said most files between Ottawa and Manitoba are positive. But, "there are a few more challenging files like health and asylum seekers," wroteOliviaBaldwin-Valainisin anemail.

"On health, we are making progress and look forward to getting back to the negotiating table once we have received formal, written confirmation that the unfortunate linkage to an economic and advanced manufacturing project has been withdrawn," she said.

Manitoba MP Jim Carr had an optimistic interpretation of Pallister's budget review.

"I hear he said what were the words 'not a bad budget.' So I would say that's praise of a kind," he said, heading into caucus.

The budget providedmore details about the government's previously announced $81.2-billion infrastructure plan, including $7 billion over 10 years to create new child-care spaces across the country.The government predicts there could be up to 40,000 new subsidized child-care spaces in the first three years of its national program.

Wednesday's budget included $7 billion over 10 years to create new child-care spaces. (Manitoba Theatre for Young People)

Minister of Families, Children and Social Development Jean-Yves DuclossaidOttawa expects to sign bilateral agreements on child-care with the provinces and territories by the summer.

"Those conversations are now going faster and we look forward to further announcements," he said.

"This is a very collaborative exercise. All provinces and all territories are supportive of the principles that we believe to be important in investments in early learning and child care, principles of quality, principles of affordability, inclusiveness so that all children, wherever they may be, and however they may be living, have the same fair and equal chance of living well and doing well. And the same thing for parents."

The two-day national caucus meeting was the first time all Liberal MPs have met together since more than 100 backbenchers turned against their cabinet colleagues and voted in favour of now-retired Liberal senator Jim Cowan'santi-genetic discrimination bill, a piece of legislation the prime minister himself said was unconstitutional.

On Saturday Trudeausaid his caucus is more united than ever.

"One of the great strengths of the Liberal party is there is always a range of perspectives that allow us to represent the range of perspectives of Canadians."

Read the original here:
Liberals must sell budget to premiers after 'challenging' health talks - CBC.ca