Archive for February, 2017

Trump is doing precisely what he criticized Obama for doing on foreign policy – The Denver Post

Drew Angerer, Getty Images

During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump accused Barack Obama of treating Americas adversaries with tender love and care while our allies were snubbed and criticized by an administration that lacks moral clarity.

Weve picked fights with our oldest friends, Trump declared in his April 2016 foreign policy speech, adding Weve had a president who dislikes our friends and bows to our enemies.

Trump was absolutely right. From Iran to Cuba, Obama bent over backwards to court our adversaries. At the same time, he mistreated our closest allies allowing Israel to get bullied by the U.N. Security Council and canceling missile defense deals with Poland and the Czech Republic in a misguided effort to curry favor with Moscow.

So why, less than two weeks into his presidency, is Trump doing precisely what he criticized Obama for doing picking fights with one of our oldest friends, Australia, while treating our adversary, Russia, with tender love and care?

When Fox News Bill OReilly challenged Trump on his praise for Vladimir Putin this weekend, declaring, Putins a killer, Trump responded, There are a lot of killers, adding, Weve got a lot of killers. What, do you think our countrys so innocent?

Had Obama said these words, every conservative in America would have erupted with outrage. Equating U.S. actions with those of our enemies is a tried-and-true tactic of the left. Remember how appalled we were when Obama declared that America should get off its high horse in criticizing Islamic terrorists because of the terrible deeds committed in the name of Christ during the Crusades? Or when he drew a moral equivalence between Irans decades of terrorist murder and the role the CIA played in the 1950s overthrow of a democratically-elected Iranian government in his infamous Cairo speech? Why would Trump follow Obamas model, and draw the same false moral equivalence between the United States and Russia?

At the very moment Trump was speaking with OReilly, Russian opposition activist Vladimir Kara-Murza lay fighting for his life in a Moscow hospital, after being poisoned under mysterious circumstances. He was similarly poisoned in 2015, and barely survived. His crime? Lobbying Congress to impose economic sanctions against Russia under the Magnistky Act, a law that itself was named for a Russian human rights lawyer who was beaten to death in Putins jails. Kara-Murza and Magnitsky are not alone. In 2015, opposition activist Boris Nemtsov was assassinated by gunmen on a bridge within sight of the Kremlin. And in 2016, a British judge found that Putin was likely behind the assassination of Alexander Litvinenko, a former Russian spy turned Putin critic, who was poisoned in London with radioactive polonium-210.

Trump says he wants to get along with Putin. Theres nothing wrong with trying. But getting along with Putin does not require excusing this campaign of political murder, or suggesting that the U.S. acts similarly. As William F. Buckley once famously put it, To say that the CIA and the KGB engage in similar practices is the equivalent of saying that the man who pushes an old lady into the path of a hurtling bus is not to be distinguished from the man who pushes an old lady out of the path of a hurtling bus: on the grounds that, after all, in both cases someone is pushing old ladies around.

Worse still, Trumps defense of Putin came just days after he scolded Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull over an agreement he had reached with President Obama to take in 1,250 refugees held at Australian detention centers from Iran, Iraq, Somalia and other countries. Yes, it was poor form for Turnbull and Obama to make this deal after Trump was elected. Yes, Australia was stupid to press Trump to take in a group refugees that they themselves refuse to let into their country many of whom hailed from the very nations for which Trump had just temporarily suspended immigration. But Australia is also one of our closest allies a nation that has fought beside us in every war we have fought in the last century from World War I to Iraq and Afghanistan. There was no reason for Trump to tell Turnbull that theirs was the worst call by far he has had with any world leader including, apparently, Vladimir Putin. The leader of Americas closest ally deserved at least the same kind of deference that Trump seems to be willing to extend to the leader of one of our greatest adversaries.

Trump told the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington that we have to get tough because the world is in trouble. Hes correct. For eight years, the Obama administration projected weakness in the world, and the consequences have been devastating from the rise of the Islamic State, to Syrias brutal use of chemical weapons on its own people, to the spread of Iranian hegemony in the Middle East, North Koreas nuclear and missile tests, and Chinas cyberattacks on America and building of military bases on disputed islands in the South China Sea.

We do need to get tough, and Trump is doing so. He has imposed new sanctions on Iran for its illegal ballistic missile tests a sea change from Obama, who delivered pallets of unmarked foreign currency to Tehran on secret planes. And instead of just droning terrorists, like Obama did, Trump put boots on the ground, sending a special operations team to Yemen to take out al-Qaeda leaders and capturing intelligence that Obama would have vaporized.

This is all to the good. But as Trump jettisons Obamas policies of weakness, he should also banish Obamas troubling habit of treating our allies worse than our enemies and of drawing a moral equivalence between our actions and theirs.

Marc A. Thiessen writes a weekly column for The Washington Post on foreign and domestic policy.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by e-mail or mail.

See the original post:
Trump is doing precisely what he criticized Obama for doing on foreign policy - The Denver Post

‘Obama Day’ Could Be Illinois’ First New Holiday In 40 Years – DNAinfo

The Illinois Legislature is considering creating a state holiday for former President Barack Obama. View Full Caption

Facebook/President Obama

CHICAGO If some state lawmakers have their way, former President Barack Obamas birthdaysoon will be aholiday in Illinois.

Three bills arebeing debated in the Illinois House and Senate that would honor Obama'sAug. 4 birthday.

The two House bills would create a legal holiday, which would close state offices and schools the Monday after the former president's birthday. Businesses would have the option of closing. The Senate bill lays out plans for acommemorative day that would not require any offices to close.

The House bills would create the first new state holiday in 40 years and would be the first time a living president was ever honored with a legal holiday in the state.

In his call for the holiday state Rep. Andr Thapedi (D-Ashburn) said other states honor presidents. Texas honors Lyndon B. Johnson and California honors Ronald Reagan. He said Obama is a Nobel Peace Prize winner and part of Illinois history.

I thought those distinctions meant he should be honored hes basically an Illinoisan, Thapedi said Monday.

He introduced a similar bill last year, but it failed to move forward because Obama was still in office and the costs of closing state offices was estimated to be $3.2 million.

Thapedi said he thinks the bill has a better chance now that Obamas out of office, and he'sasked that the cost estimates be reassessed.

Recognizing fiscal constraints were under now, it would not be unreasonable to take those things into consideration, Thapedi said.

Gov. Bruce Rauner's office did notimmediately respond to questions about whether Rauner would support the proposal.

State Rep. Sonya Harper (D-Back of the Yards) has introduced a bill that copies Thapedis bill word for word.

She said she believed Obama was one of the greatest presidents of her lifetime and should be afforded the full honor of a state holiday.

Harper said she was unaware of any similarities ot Thapedi's bill and said she suspected they were both written by the same staffer at the Legislative Reference Bureau, which helps draft legislation for lawmakers.

She said the bills will be combined in the committee review process or one will move forward.

Illinois was the first state in the country to adopt Martin Luther King Jr. Day in 1973.

Casmir Pulaski Day was instituted by the Legislature in 1977. Chicago closes city offices in recognition of the birthday of the Revolutionary War cavalry officer, but state offices do not close.

Follow this link:
'Obama Day' Could Be Illinois' First New Holiday In 40 Years - DNAinfo

Trump blames ‘Obama people’ for leaking details of calls with foreign leaders – New York Post


TPM
Trump blames 'Obama people' for leaking details of calls with foreign leaders
New York Post
President Trump is blaming Obama people for the embarrassing leaks of contentious private phone calls he's had with the leaders of Australia and Mexico. It's a disgrace that they leaked because it's very much against our country, Trump told Fox ...
Trump Accuses 'Obama People' Of Leaking Details Of His Calls With LeadersTPM
Trump Says White House Leaks Coming From Obama Admin HoldoversDaily Caller
Amid gush of White House leaks, Trump points his finger at 'Obama people'The Week Magazine
Fox News -Western Journalism
all 15 news articles »

Read the original:
Trump blames 'Obama people' for leaking details of calls with foreign leaders - New York Post

Exclusive Rand Paul to Oppose Elliott Abrams for State Department Slot – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Pauls decision to come out against Abrams strikes a damaging blow againsthis chances of ever receiving Senate confirmation should he be nominated, outside of bipartisan support that hes unlikely to receive or a full-court press by Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

With 21 members11 Republicans and 10 Democratsif the Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hold strong against Abrams should Trump select him, Pauls vote would be the deciding vote and he would fail in Committee. His decision to oppose Abrams per a senior aide puts the kibosh on Abrams chances once and for all, unless a Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee comes out for himor unless McConnell and Corker try to bring him up straight on the Senate floor despite failing in Committee, something a senior Senate aide tells Breitbart News is not usually done.

Given how difficult Pauls decision here would make it to get Abrams through the Senate to confirmation should he be nominated, its unclear if Trump and his White House would want to go to such lengths to fight for someone who disagrees with the president on so many corepolicy visions. Abrams does not believe in an America First foreign policy vision, is from a wing of the GOP that Trump regularly criticizes, and has significant disagreements with Trumps stated vision on core matters like the Middle East and the Arab Spring.

Pauls efforts, a senior aide adds, are meant to be constructive. Since Abrams policy viewpoints dont match Trumps vision for foreign policy, Paul believes that Trump should turn to someone else.Paul will make this argument, and officially make his announcement against Abrams, in an op-ed that will be published on Tuesday.

In a country of 300 million people, surely there are reasonable foreign policy experts who have not been convicted of deceiving Congress and actually share the Presidents foreign policy views, Paul writes in an excerpt of the op-ed that will run in Rare, obtained by Breitbart News ahead of its release.

The fact Abrams is even being considered for the slot is baffling to many Trump supporters, given that he was aiding the Never Trump movement inside the Republican Partyand that he has a foreign policy worldview much more in line with the political dynasties Trump crushed on his way to the White House, the Bushes and the Clintons.

Elliott Abrams, a neoconservative who has long argued for an activist foreign policy that spreads American values around the world, was advising Republicans just last spring to keep your distance from Donald J. Trump and offering advice about what the party should do after the Trump collapse, the New York Times Gardiner Harris and David E. Sanger wrote on Monday night.

Nonetheless, Abrams has a meeting scheduled on Tuesday at the White House with President Trump to interview for the number two position in the State Department.

The Times reports that Abrams is known in foreign policy circles as controversial, but his conviction over misleading Congress in connection with the Iran-Contra scandal from the Ronald Reagan administration deeply understates the case. Abrams was later pardoned by Reagans successor in the White House.

He is remembered best for the days when he was an assistant secretary of state during the Reagan administration, and his conviction in 1991 on two misdemeanor counts of withholding information from Congress during the Iran-contra affair, Harris and Sanger wrote. He was later pardoned by President George Bush, and that moment has largely receded from memory although if he is nominated, there is little question that Democrats will bring it up again.

Before the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July, the National Interests Daniel DePetris noted in a recent piece, Abrams pushed for Republicans to challenge Trump head on at the convention where he would be chosenas the GOP nominee for president.

Do not allow the Republican convention to be a coronation wherein Trump and Trumpism are unchallenged, Abrams said, urging the Never Trump movement to challenge him on the floor of the convention. Theres no reason others who won many delegates, from Rubio to Cruz to Kasich, should not have their names put in nomination. The party needs to be reminded that there are deep divisions, and Trump needs to be reminded of how many in the party oppose and even fear his nomination.

Abrams also called for Republicans to seize the party machinery back from conservatives and grassroots Trump supporters immediately after the Trump defeat by Hillary Rodham Clinton, something the man President Trump is now considering for the second highest diplomatic post in his administration said was inevitable, but which turned out not to happen.

P.J. Medias David Goldman writes that selecting Abrams would be like picking an arsonist to serve as a towns fire chief. While Goldman understands that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson may need an experienced diplomat to help run the State Department and has few good choices, picking Abrams would be a mistake.

Bringing the Bush Utopians back into the picture, though, would be a cure far worse than the disease, Goldman wrote. During the campaign, Abrams made clear that he would rather see his party fail than see Donald Trump succeed. Inside the administration, Abrams would have the opportunity to make this happen. Arsonists may have great experience with fires, but that doesnt qualify them to become the captain of the fire brigade.

Now, with Rand Paul coming out against Abrams preemptivelybefore Abrams even meets with the president on Tuesdayhe may be saving the movement the trouble of a fight.

Excerpt from:
Exclusive Rand Paul to Oppose Elliott Abrams for State Department Slot - Breitbart News

Sharon DuBois: Libertarians offer a choice of freedom – Kansas City Star


Kansas City Star
Sharon DuBois: Libertarians offer a choice of freedom
Kansas City Star
Fiscally responsible and socially accepting, the Libertarian Party believes that all people have the right to live their lives as they see fit, as long as they do not interfere with or take that same right away from others. We also believe that when ...

Excerpt from:
Sharon DuBois: Libertarians offer a choice of freedom - Kansas City Star