Archive for February, 2017

Donald Trump, media saviour – BBC News


BBC News
Donald Trump, media saviour
BBC News
Donald Trump is, by sheer force of character, destroying the mainstream media as we know it. His relentless barrage of abuse, not least about "fake news", has fatally undermined the trust of the American people in their traditional sources of news; and ...
Donald Trump's Dangerous End GameNew Republic
Donald Trump Says Your Opinions Are Fake If You Don't Like His PoliciesHuffington Post

all 190 news articles »

Originally posted here:
Donald Trump, media saviour - BBC News

Google, Amazon, and Microsoft Donated to Donald Trump’s Inauguration – Fortune

President Donald Trump delivers his inaugural address on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol on Jan.20, 2017 in Washington, D.C.Alex WongGetty Images

Before voicing their opposition to President Donald Trump's immigration policies , a handful of tech giants offered their greenbacks to the commander-in-chief's inauguration.

Amazon ( amzn ) , Google ( googl ) , and Microsoft all donated both cash and services to the now president's January inauguration, according to a late Tuesday Politico report citing federal ethics documents and sources familiar with the matter. Microsoft ( msft ) alone gave $250,000 in cash, and the same amount in services.

While Facebook ( fb ) made no cash donation, the company did provide Instagram photos booths and a mini Oval Office for those celebrating Trump's inauguration, Politico confirmed.

Roughly a week later, the same tech giants spoke out against Trump's ban on immigration from seven Muslim-majority nations.

Corporate America has regularly donated to inaugural committees in past years, regardless of political party. For President Barack Obama's second inauguration, Microsoft donated roughly $2 million in cash and services, according to data from the Federal Election Commission.

Link:
Google, Amazon, and Microsoft Donated to Donald Trump's Inauguration - Fortune

Donald Trump wrong to say Kuwait followed his lead on visa ban – PolitiFact

Did Kuwait follow President Donald Trump's lead in instituting a visa ban affecting certain Muslim-majority countries?

President Donald Trump's favorite social media tool is Twitter. But Trump turned to Facebook recently to defend his executive order on visas and travel from seven countries.

Trumps Facebook postseemed to rally supporters around the wisdom of his executive order, which suspended entry for most foreign travelers from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen for 120 days.

He commented, "Smart! 'Kuwait issues its own Trump-esque visa ban for five Muslim-majority countries. " The post linked to an article published on the English-language version of the Arabic-language website Al Bawaba on Feb. 1 that featured the headline Trump quoted in his post:

But the government of Kuwait -- a small, Arab monarchy wedged between Iraq and Saudi Arabia on the Persian Gulf -- publicly rejected the notion that it had followed Trumps lead by banning travel by Muslims.

Kuwait "categorically denied media reports that it planned to stop issuing entry visas for some nationalities," read a statement from Sami Al-Hamad, Kuwaits assistant foreign minister for consular affairs. He added that "citizens of those countries mentioned by social media visited Kuwait regularly through direct commercial flights."

Other diplomats, including the Pakistani envoy in Kuwait and Kuwaits charge daffaires in Iran, backed up Kuwaits statement.

Kuwaits denial was picked up by such mainstream media outlets as Reuters. But as of the afternoon of Feb. 7, Trumps post remained up and uncorrected, as did the Al Bawaba article he had linked to.

So whats going on here? The short answer is that Trumps Facebook post was wrong. The longer answer, however, needs to fill in some important background. (The White House did not provide PolitiFact with any backup material. Attempts to reach the Kuwaiti embassy in Washington were unsuccessful.)

Travel restrictions for Kuwait happened years ago

We found several news accounts from years ago that generally said Kuwait had banned visas for several Muslim countries in 2011 before easing the rules a bit in 2013.

A Gulf News article dated May 22, 2011, said that "Kuwait has banned nationals from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan from entering the country, local media reported. The ban includes suspending all tourism, visit and trade visas as well as visas sponsored by spouses, immigration sources said, quoted by Kuwaiti media yesterday."

The article cited unnamed sources saying that the "visa ban," which was described as "temporary," stemmed from the "difficult security conditions in the five countries" and to "the remarkably increasing tendency of nationals from the five countries to apply for visas to bring in relatives who faced or could face arrest by the local authorities to Kuwait."

Another Gulf News article dated July 8, 2013, noted that Yemen was later added to the visa-ban list.

The 2013 article noted that in January of that year, Kuwait "eased" the ban from those six countries by allowing public-sector workers to bring their wives and children with them, and by allowing private-sector workers to bring their sons if they were under 15 years old and their daughters if they were under 18.

Finally, in 2014, Kuwait eased its visa rules -- but excluded Iran, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Pakistan, or Afghanistan from those expanded rules.

So, while Trump was wrong to say in his Facebook post that Kuwait had followed his lead, Kuwait did have restrictions in previous years.

"Historically, Kuwait has issued travel bans on certain nationalities due to specific events," said Edward W. Gnehm Jr., who studies the Gulf region at George Washington Universitys Elliott School of International Affairs. He noted that Kuwait banned entry by Palestinians, Yemenis and Iraqis after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991 since it considered those countries or their people to have been supportive of Iraq's occupation of Kuwait.

That said, Kuwait has some practical restrictions on how firmly it can crack down on travel from these countries, said Kristin Smith Diwan, a senior resident scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington.

"There are lots of Syrians living in Kuwait, and they certainly havent been evicted," Diwan said. "It also would have been very unpopular with Kuwaitis who had enormous sympathy for Syrians and the uprising, especially in the early part of the war."

Diwan added that Kuwait "has lots of business with both Iraq and Iran," making a total ban difficult. In fact, she said, the Kuwaiti Emir recently visited Iran to explore the potential for de-escalation on behalf of Kuwait and its neighbors.

Another key point is that the immigration systems of the United States and Kuwait are akin to "apples and oranges," said David Andrew Weinberg, a Gulf specialist at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

"Kuwait, unlike the United States, is not a multiethnic democracy," Weinberg said. "It is a family-ruled monarchy and ethnically-based nation that does not offer a route to citizenship to immigrants. In fact, Kuwait doesnt even grant citizenship to enormous numbers of bedoon individuals who have been there for generations but arent recognized as Kuwaiti by the state."

Estimates put the number of expatriates in Kuwait at more than 2 million, accounting for about two-thirds of the countrys population and much of its workforce.

In other words, Weinberg said, Kuwait, unlike the United States, doesnt have an immigration system for people to come and stay and become citizens. So any movement toward a stricter immigration policy would have much bigger consequences in the United States than in Kuwait.

If you click through the Al Bawaba story that Trump linked to, that article sources its information to another article, from a London-based website called The New Arab. That article now includes a note at the bottom stating in part, "This article has been updated to reflect the fact that the ban came into force, unofficially, in 2011, and was not a reaction to Donald Trump's recent executive order."

So the original media source that Trumps post is based on doesnt even stand by the message of its original headline.

Our ruling

On Facebook, Trump said, "Smart! 'Kuwait issues its own Trump-esque visa ban for five Muslim-majority countries.'"

Thats wrong -- news coverage suggests that Kuwait implemented a visa ban on a half-dozen predominantly Muslim nations in 2011, six years before Trump took office.

Meanwhile, any argument that Kuwaits past actions indicate a like-minded approach between Trump and Kuwait sidesteps the reality that pursuing such a policy in the United States inevitably has a much bigger impact because the U.S., unlike Kuwait, allows a path to citizenship for legal immigrants. We rate the statement Mostly False.

Original post:
Donald Trump wrong to say Kuwait followed his lead on visa ban - PolitiFact

Journalist says she was the target of an ‘alt-right’ lynch mob | Public … – PRI

It all started with a column.

On Jan. 30, Rosa Brooks wrote an editorial in Foreign Policy magazine speculating about what would happen if Donald Trump actually went insane. She mused that Trump could be impeached, or that he could be removed by the vice president and the cabinet. "And then at the very end of the column, I said there's something I always assumed was unthinkable in this country, which is the military refusingto obey orders, or even a coup. But for the first [time] in my life, I could imagine a scenario where that actually happens, and that's frightening."

At first, nothing happened. But then a few days after the column came out, she boarded a plane from Washington, DC,to Houston. Everything was quiet when she got on the plane. "But I got off, and I had hundreds and hundreds of new tweets and emails. And I thought, 'What the heck happened?'"

Breitbart News the website pandering to the "alt-right" and white supremacists previously run by Steve Bannon, now Donald Trump's top political adviser had run a story about her column, called "Ex-Obama Official Suggests Military Coup Against Trump."Soon, conspiracy-oriented outlets from InfoWars to white supremacist websites likeDaily Stormer claimed she was threatening the violent overthrow of the USgovernment.

"I swear I wasn't actually planning a coup!" she says.

Still, the hate mail flowed in. She was bombarded with obscene, racistand violent tweets, callsand emails. One email warned, "I AM GOING TO CUT OFF YOUR HEAD ... BITCH." Other messages threatened to shoot her, hang her, deport herand imprison her.

At first, Brooks says she downplayed the threats. "I thought, 'Oh, OK. So you get a bunch of crazy people who have nothing better to do than sit down and send you nasty emails. So what else is new?'"

But then she remembered theshooting at Comet Ping Pong in December.

Comet Ping Pong restaurant was the target of fake news stories saying it was harboringa child sex ring run by Hillary Clinton. "Everybody including myself said, 'Oh that's so silly. Nobody could possibly believe that. It's just goofy," recalls Brooks. But a North Carolina man read the story and stormed the pizzeria with a military-style assault rifle. Brooks says events like that make it harder to dismiss the threats against her as hot air."That kind of incident is sobering. It only takes one crazy person to take silly crazy internet rumors seriously to create a real danger."

Brooks concedes online harassment of journalists is nothing new. Over the years, Brooks says she's received plenty of hate mail. But something feels different now.

With Trump and Bannon in the White House, Brooks says she's no longer confident that journalists are safe from government crackdowns."When you have a president in the White House who feels free to go make personal attacks on federal judges, foreign leaders, etc. ... it does start feeling like all bets are off."

At the end of the day, Brooks says journalists must not be intimidated into silence. "My biggest fear is that people will stop speaking truth."

Brooks, who wrote her own column about the experience, promises to redouble her efforts to ask the hard questions, have uncomfortable conversationsand challenge executive overreach.

"We do have a set of really important Constitutional norms in this country. And we're seeing them challenged from the White House itself in a very public way. And that's scary, and we have to call it scary," Brooks says. "Pushing back against treating this as if it's just normal is really, really important for all of us to do."

Here is the original post:
Journalist says she was the target of an 'alt-right' lynch mob | Public ... - PRI

JK Rowling Has Been Roasting Alt-Right Trolls and it’s Glorious – Forward

In case you missed it, J.K. Rowling has been absolutely killing it on Twitter.

When the Harry Potter author isnt busy giving her take on Donald Trump or retweeting powerful messages on Holocaust Memorial Day, shes going to toe-to-toe with alt-right trolls.

Case in point: Rowlings response to a user with a Pepe the Frog avatar (the signature alt-right symbol) calling her Mrs. Shitty Writer (burn)

Rowling took the comment in stride, writing: sighs Well, who knows? If I try harder, I might be reincarnated as a lonely virgin hiding behind a cartoon frog.

One user commented back in jest wondering if Rowling had beef with all virgins, to which the author quickly clarified her position.

Unless theyre sublimating their frustration in alt-right politics, I wish every one of them fulfilment and happiness <3, she tweeted.

She then wrote back to another avatar-masked troll, who accused her of hiding behind a fictional dweeb ass child.

Unless youre actually a hooded chihuahua, Im pretty sure I win on the not hiding front. I quite like old whore, though. #Shakespearean, Rowling wrote.

Keep at it, J.K., keep at it.

Thea Glassman is an Associate Editor at the Forward. Reach her at glassman@forward.com or on Twitter at @theakglassman.

The Forward's independent journalism depends on donations from readers like you.

Read the original here:
JK Rowling Has Been Roasting Alt-Right Trolls and it's Glorious - Forward