Archive for June, 2016

How to Tell a Democrat from a Republican

Guest Editorial How to Tell a Democrat from a Republican by Leon Felkins Conservative, n. - A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others. -- Ambrose Bierce

Many of you have expressed great confusion, in these troubled times, in trying to tell a Republican from a Democrat. Sure, we know what they say they are; most of them have well displayed nameplates. But could you tell one from the other in a blind test? That is, without prior knowledge and access to his/her nameplate, could you determine which was which simply by his/her actions? Probably not. The purpose of this essay is to assist you in making such an identification. In the following paragraphs, I will list the major issues of our times and clearly identify the differences between the Republican and Democrat approaches to these issues.

Both think that domestic animals and the raising thereof need massive government support. This often results in an excess of such animals, which are then killed, burnt or buried instead of being shipped off to starving humanity around the world because to do so might upset the local economy.

Because Democrats are genetically compassionate, they are opposed to capital punishment especially if it is someone who has tortured and molested 27 women and children to death as it is self evident that such a person has had a bad childhood, probably having his pacifier forcibly taken before he was nine years old. However, Democrats do make an exception to this opinion, if the victims were actually a close friend or part of the family. That family includes the family of government employees such as those that were blown up in Oklahoma City. In cases like that, the guy ought to be hung out in the sun by his testicles and left to die a slow death.

The Republican's position on this issue is clear and is based upon the Judeo/Christian bible: an eye for an eye. That we are not always completely sure that we have the right dude before we send him on his way to St. Peter is not really all that serious of an issue. "God will sort it out" is their most commonly stated rationale for slaughtering a group of people that from their very looks it is obvious that they are guilty -- of something. Actually God really only gave us a hint as to the real possibilities: how about a lopped head for a mashed finger, for instance? That certainly should work even better. I understand that there are now over 50 offenses for which you can be given a quick dispatch to meet your maker.

Democrats have no qualms about about recreational drugs. In fact they think the use of such drugs is cool. However, medicinal drugs are another matter. Since they think of the general populace as children, they want these drugs highly regulated.

Recreational drugs are absolutely verboten according to the Republicans. It is rumored that many folks actually have great fun with such drugs, therefore they are opposed, of course, as it is a basic principle of Conservatism that having too much fun is bad for the character.

On the other hand, Republicans would allow you to prescribe and buy medicinal drugs without constraint as the drug industry is quite profitable. If you use the wrong drug or a bit too much, then the subsequent repairs to your body will again raise the national income just a bit.

Republicans support the consumption of vast quantities of alcohol even though it kills more people by a factor of ten than all the "illegal" drugs combined. This makes sense because while it may get you high and out of control, technically it is not a "controlled substance".

Strangely, while Republicans oppose the use of recreational drugs and Democrats are much more tolerant, they both support, with great enthusiasm, the so-called War on Drugs (WOD). That is because the WOD has little to do with drugs but is big business with large profits and incentives as well as an expression of political agendas and control.

Making a distinction between Republicans and Democrats with regard to the WOD is difficult for several reasons that are fundamental to what government is all about. I list a few:

That said, there are small but helpful differences:

The Democrats, as well as the Republicans, support the WOD, if for no other reason, because to do otherwise would result in the loss of votes. However, Democrats also support the concept as it allows the U.S. to act as the world policeman. Socialism is never going to work without one-world government.

The Republicans love the WOD because it allows us to build up the military, throw a lot of people in jail that don't come around to the prescribed religious/moral values, and is very profitable.

Democrats make no excuses about massive government spending. For the government to provide a happy, healthy, shameless, and even exciting society, for everyone, regardless of their personal means, requires a massive amount of cash from the citizens as well as all you can borrow. Further, to make sure that no citizen gets into trouble and is in bed each night at a reasonable hour, a huge government staff is a necessity. This, in turn, requires every dime the public can spare and just a bit more.

Republicans, in their hearts, and especially at campaign time, really would like to cut back on government spending -- especially such luxuries as the social, environmental, and health programs. But there are necessities that it would be irresponsible to avoid. Such things as National Defense, which requires a military budget far greater than any we have had in any major war, can no more be cut back than you can cut back on helping the folks back home that need a superhighway to the new park out in the country. These are essential expenditures unlike the "feel good" stuff of the Democrats. When Iraq threatens our shores by such hostile actions as flying one of their planes over the southern half of their country, we better be ready for action.

Democrats are great believers in the concept of Liberty for all of humanity. It's just that individual humans need to be restrained -- for their on good of course. It would be irresponsible to let an individual endanger their health by eating greasy theater popcorn or drinking water from a mountain stream that some fish has peed in (and hasn't been tested by a government agency). Sadly, when you face the reality, every aspect of human activity must be controlled by the superior knowledge of the government bureaucrat. That government bureaucrats themselves are sometimes accused of being human is a fallacious argument as their holistic association results in superior knowledge.

Republicans would like to give people lots of freedom especially those that are economically active such the officers of large corporations and farmers. However, some aspects of human nature just cannot go unpunished. There must be law and order. Violence must be stopped if we have to kill every one of the sorry bastards. Republicans feel that they have the monstrous responsibility of enforcing God's word. It is not a matter of public vote. People who have unapproved sex, get high on anything (including testosterone) except approved drugs such as alcohol, cigarettes, and caffeine, don't regularly go to an approved church, allow their kids to kiss before they get married, and talk smart to policemen that are dutifully beating the hell out of them, must receive appropriate punishment.

Surprizingly, an amazing amount of property is in someway related to a crime. For example, let us say that some pot dealer is driving down the street and decides to turn his car around using your driveway. It is obvious that your property has now aided in a crime for if it had not been there, the druggie's auto would have fallen into a bottomless pit. Case closed.

Got a suggestion for Leon's dictionary? Drop him a line at leonf@magnolia.net!

Read the original here:
How to Tell a Democrat from a Republican

Rand Paul on the Issues

2016 Presidential Candidates Rand Paul On the issues>> Profile VoteMatch 2016 Presidential Candidate OnTheIssues Books: Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush on the Issues (2014) Marco Rubio vs. Jeb Bush on the Issues (2015) Hillary Clinton vs. Rand Paul on the Issues (2015) Rand Paul vs. Jeb Bush on the Issues (2015) Romney vs. Obama on the Issues (2012) Ron Paul vs. Barack Obama on the Issues (2012) Obama-Biden vs. Romney-Ryan on the Issues (2012) 2016 Democratic contenders: Joe Biden (Vice President) Lincoln Chafee (Governor Lincoln Chafee,RI) Hillary Clinton (Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton,and NY Senator) Martin O`Malley (Governor Martin O`Malley,MD) Bernie Sanders (Vermont Senator) Elizabeth Warren (Senator,MA) James Webb (Former Senator,VA) 2016 Republican contenders: Jeb Bush (Former Florida Governor) Ben Carson (Tea Party favorite and M.D.) Chris Christie (New Jersey Governor) Ted Cruz (Texas Senator) Carly Fiorina (California CEO) Jim Gilmore (Former Virginia Governor) Lindsey Graham (South Carolina Senator) Mike Huckabee (Former Arkansas Governor) Bobby Jindal (Louisiana Governor) John Kasich (Former Ohio Governor) Sarah Palin (Former Alaska Governor) George Pataki (Former N.Y. Governor) Rand Paul (Kentucky Senator) Rick Perry (Texas Governor) Marco Rubio (Florida Senator) Rick Santorum (Former Pennsylvania Senator) Donald Trump (N.Y. CEO) Scott Walker (Wisconsin Governor) 2016 Third Party contenders: Roseanne Barr (Peace & Justice party, Hawaii) Michael Bloomberg (Independent NYC Mayor) Gary Johnson (Former New Mexico Governor, Libertarian Party) Jill Stein (Green Party, MA) Confused by the long list above? All are explained on our 2016 Presidential Speculation page! Archives 2016 Kentucky Senate race Survey of 2016 Presidential contenders' campaign websites Sunday Political Talk Show interviews throughout 2013-2015 CNN/Salem Republican Debate in Nevada Syrian Refugee Crisis Fox Business/Wall Street Journal Two-Tier 2015 GOP primary debate CNBC Two-Tier 2015 GOP primary debate CNN Two-Tier 2015 GOP primary debate Fox News/Facebook Two-Tier 2015 GOP primary debate Meet the Press interviews, throughout 2015 Fox News Sunday interviews, throughout 2015 PBS News Hour: 2016 Candidate Stands Forbes Magazine: Candidates Want You to Know CNN "State of the Union" interviews, throughout 2015 American Leaders Speak Out on Criminal Justice: Brennan Center for Justice essays CBS "Face the Nation" interviews, thoughout 2015 Ron Paul vs. Rand Paul On The Issues, by Jesse Gordon of OnTheIssues.org National Journal 2016 presidential series Sunday Political Talk Show interviews throughout 2015 Speeches at 2015 CPAC conference 2015 State of the Union address to Congress SC newspaper: The State The Washington Post DC newspaper: The Washington Blade CA newspaper: The Los Angeles Times Meet the Press interviews, throughout 2014 Sunday Political Talk Show interviews throughout 2014 CNN "State of the Union" interviews, throughout 2014 CBS "Face the Nation" interviews, thoughout 2014 ABC This Week interviews, throughout 2014 Speeches at 2014 CPAC conference 2014 State of the Union address to Congress The Hill on 2014 campaigns Meet the Press interviews, throughout 2013 Sunday Political Talk Show interviews throughout 2013 Fox News Sunday interviews, throughout 2013 CNN "State of the Union" interviews, throughout 2013 ABC This Week interviews, throughout 2013 Revitalize America, by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) Speeches at 2013 CPAC conference 2013 State of the Union address to Congress The Hill on 2010-2013 campaigns 2013 FactCheck Government Bullies, by Rand Paul 2012 Values Voters Summit Hosted by the Family Research Council 2012 RNC speeches Now Or Never, by Sen. Jim DeMint The Washington Times Survey of 2012 Presidential contenders' campaign websites The Tea Party Goes to Washington, by Rand Paul (Feb. 22, 2011) Speeches at 2011 CPAC conference OnTheIssues Fact Checking 2011 FactCheck Time magazine Reason%ag magazine The Nation magazine Survey of 2009 and 2010 Senate campaign websites Fox News coverage of 2010 Senate races ABC coverage of 2010 Senate races 2010 Kentucky Senate Debates 2010: Take Back America, by Dick Morris & Eileen McGann NY newspaper: Wall Street Journal Political coverage on Politico.com NY newspaper: The New York Times Political coverage on The Huffington Post Political coverage by the Associated Press Kentucky Archives End the Fed, by Ron Paul Fact-Check KY Senate Debate Bill sponsorship archives from the Library of Congress

(click a picture above for excerpts or other books and debates by or about Rand_Paul)

More:
Rand Paul on the Issues

Mount Laurel, New Jersey – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mount Laurel is a township in Burlington County, New Jersey, United States, and is an edge city suburb of Philadelphia. As of the 2010 United States Census, the township's population was 41,864,[9][10][11] reflecting an increase of 1,643 (+4.1%) from the 40,221 counted in the 2000 Census, which had in turn increased by 9,951 (+32.9%) from the 30,270 counted in the 1990 Census.[20] It is the home of NFL Films.

Mount Laurel was incorporated as a township by an act of the New Jersey Legislature on March 7, 1872, from portions of Evesham Township.[21] The township was named for a hill covered with laurel trees.[22]

There are several historical landmarks, including General Clinton's headquarters, Paulsdale, Evesham Friends Meeting House, Jacob's Chapel, Hattie Britt School and Farmer's Hall.[23]

The Mount Laurel Decision is a judicial interpretation of the New Jersey State Constitution that requires municipalities to use their zoning powers in an affirmative manner to provide a realistic opportunity for the production of housing affordable to low and moderate income households. The decision was a result of a lawsuit brought against the town by the N.A.A.C.P. that was decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court in 1975 and reaffirmed in a subsequent decision in 1983.[24]

The history behind this, and the story leading to the Decision was highlighted in a book by David L. Kirp called Our Town.[25]

Mount Laurel was a small, poor rural farming community until it was hit with massive suburban growth from Philadelphia in the later 1900s. Poor families, whose history had resided there for centuries, were suddenly priced out of buying additional property. In 1970, at a meeting about a proposal for affordable housing, held at an all black church in Mount Laurel, Mayor Bill Haines summed up the newcomers perspectives by saying "If you people can't afford to live in our town, then you'll just have to leave."[25]

Even though the poor black families in Mount Laurel were not from urban ghettos, and were not involved in gang activity, the new suburban influx thought otherwise, and significantly delayed the creation of affordable housing, citing concerns of gang activity and an influx of inner city criminals. Exampled comments from town meetings against being forced to build housing projects in their town included "we need this like Custer needed more Indians"; "it's reverse discrimination"; "we lived in this in South Philly and Newark" they said, and that the housing would be a "breeding ground for violent crime and drug abuse".[25]

Resident advocates of the housing were treated with abuse and threats. Leading advocate Ethel Lawrence, a poor black resident who lived her life in Mount Laurel, had her house repeatedly vandalized, and once her bedroom window was shot at.[26][27] Longtime white residents also turned to try to force the poor blacks out of town. Although the court ruled in favor of creating affordable housing, residents did manage to delay the process for decades.[25]

According to the United States Census Bureau, the township had a total area of 21.971 square miles (56.903km2), including 21.692 square miles (56.181km2) of land and 0.279 square miles (0.722km2) of water (1.27%).[1][2]

Ramblewood (with a 2010 Census population of 5,907) is an unincorporated community and census designated place (CDP) located within Mount Laurel.[28]

Other unincorporated communities, localities and place names located partially or completely within the township include Birchfield,[citation needed]Bougher, Centerton, Colemantown, Coxs Corner, Fellowship, Hartford, Heulings Hill, Masonville, Petersburg, Pine Grove, Rancocas Woods and Texas.[29]

At the 2010 United States Census, there were 41,864 people, 17,538 households, and 11,294 families residing in the township. The population density was 1,930.0 per square mile (745.2/km2). There were 18,249 housing units at an average density of 841.3 per square mile (324.8/km2). The racial makeup of the township was 79.42% (33,249) White, 9.70% (4,061) Black or African American, 0.16% (67) Native American, 7.26% (3,040) Asian, 0.04% (17) Pacific Islander, 1.00% (418) from other races, and 2.42% (1,012) from two or more races. Hispanics or Latinos of any race were 4.56% (1,907) of the population.[9]

There were 17,538 households, of which 28.9% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 51.0% were married couples living together, 10.5% had a female householder with no husband present, and 35.6% were non-families. 30.4% of all households were made up of individuals, and 11.8% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.38 and the average family size was 3.00.[9]

In the township, 22.3% of the population were under the age of 18, 6.3% from 18 to 24, 26.2% from 25 to 44, 29.2% from 45 to 64, and 16.1% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 41.8 years. For every 100 females there were 87.4 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 83.5 males.[9]

The Census Bureau's 2006-2010 American Community Survey showed that (in 2010 inflation-adjusted dollars) median household income was $84,632 (with a margin of error of +/- $5,366) and the median family income was $100,189 (+/- $4,065). Males had a median income of $75,870 (+/- $3,130) versus $54,215 (+/- $2,830) for females. The per capita income for the borough was $41,573 (+/- $1,416). About 3.0% of families and 3.6% of the population were below the poverty line, including 4.6% of those under age 18 and 3.8% of those age 65 or over.[39]

As of the 2000 United States Census[17] there were 40,221 people, 16,570 households, and 11,068 families residing in the township. The population density was 1,844.3 people per square mile (712.0/km). There were 17,163 housing units at an average density of 787.0 per square mile (303.8/km). The racial makeup of the township was 87.10% White, 6.92% African American, 0.09% Native American, 3.80% Asian, 0.03% Pacific Islander, 0.64% from other races, and 1.41% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.24% of the population.[37][38]

There were 16,570 households out of which 30.4% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 55.7% were married couples living together, 8.5% had a female householder with no husband present, and 33.2% were non-families. 27.9% of all households were made up of individuals and 8.9% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.41 and the average family size was 2.98.[37][38]

In the township the population was spread out with 23.1% under the age of 18, 5.4% from 18 to 24, 32.7% from 25 to 44, 24.2% from 45 to 64, and 14.7% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 39 years. For every 100 females there were 89.4 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 85.8 males.[37][38][38]

The median income for a household in the township was $63,750, and the median income for a family was $76,288. Males had a median income of $55,597 versus $37,198 for females. The per capita income for the township was $32,245. About 2.5% of families and 3.1% of the population were below the poverty line, including 3.9% of those under age 18 and 2.9% of those age 65 or over.[37][38]

Laurel Acres Park is known for its Veterans Memorial, fishing lake, playground, and huge grassy hill used for concerts and sledding in the winter. Laurel Acres Park is right between Church Street at Union Mill Road. The Mount Laurel Baseball League and the Mount Laurel United Soccer Club play in the park's sports fields, and since 2008, the Mount Laurel Premiership.[40]

Mount Laurel voted to change its form of government in 1970 from a Township Council form to a Faulkner Act system using the Council-Manager (Plan E), enacted based on the recommendations of a Charter Study Commission as of January 1, 1972.[41] In this form of government, the Township Manager oversees the daily functions of the Township. Township government consists of a Township Council made up of five members elected at-large in partisan elections to serve four-year terms on a staggered basis, with either two or three seats coming up for election in odd-numbered years as part of the November general election.[7] At an annual reorganization meeting held in January, the council selects one of its members to serve as mayor and another to serve as deputy mayor, each for a one-year term.[3]

As of 2016[update], members of the Mount Laurel Township Council are Mayor Linda Bobo (R, term ends December 31, 2016), Deputy Mayor Irwin Edelson (R, term on council ends 2016), Dennis Riley (R, 2018), Jim Keenan (R, 2016) and Richard Van Noord (R, 2018).[3][42][43][44][45]

Mount Laurel Township is located in the 3rd Congressional District[46] and is part of New Jersey's 7th state legislative district.[10][47][48] Prior to the 2011 reapportionment following the 2010 Census, Mount Laurel Township had been in the 8th state legislative district.[49]

New Jersey's 3rd Congressional District is represented by Tom MacArthur (R, Toms River).[50] New Jersey is represented in the United States Senate by Cory Booker (D, Newark, term ends 2021)[51] and Bob Menendez (D, Paramus, 2019).[52][53]

For the 20162017 session (Senate, General Assembly), the 7th Legislative District of the New Jersey Legislature is represented in the State Senate by Diane Allen (R, Edgewater Park Township) and in the General Assembly by Herb Conaway (D, Moorestown) and Troy Singleton (D, Palmyra).[54] The Governor of New Jersey is Chris Christie (R, Mendham Township).[55] The Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey is Kim Guadagno (R, Monmouth Beach).[56]

Burlington County is governed by a Board of chosen freeholders, whose five members are elected at-large in partisan elections to three-year terms of office on a staggered basis, with either one or two seats coming up for election each year.[57] The board chooses a director and deputy director from among its members at an annual reorganization meeting held in January.[57] As of 2015[update], Burlington County's Freeholders are Director Mary Ann O'Brien (R, Medford Township, 2017; Director of Administration and Human Services),[58] Deputy Director Bruce Garganio (R, Florence Township, 2017; Director of Public Works and Health),[59]Aimee Belgard (D, Edgewater Park Township, 2015; Director of Hospital, Medical Services and Education)[60] Joseph Donnelly (R, Cinnaminson Township, 2016; Director of Public Safety, Natural Resources, and Education)[61] and Joanne Schwartz (D, Southampton Township, 2015; Director of Health and Corrections).[62][57] Constitutional officers are County Clerk Tim Tyler,[63] Sheriff Jean E. Stanfield[64] and Surrogate George T. Kotch.[65]

As of March 23, 2011, there were a total of 28,317 registered voters in Mount Laurel Township, of which 9,089 (32.1% vs. 33.3% countywide) were registered as Democrats, 6,880 (24.3% vs. 23.9%) were registered as Republicans and 12,328 (43.5% vs. 42.8%) were registered as Unaffiliated. There were 20 voters registered to other parties.[66] Among the township's 2010 Census population, 67.6% (vs. 61.7% in Burlington County) were registered to vote, including 87.0% of those ages 18 and over (vs. 80.3% countywide).[66][67]

In the 2012 presidential election, Democrat Barack Obama received 12,634 votes (55.5% vs. 58.1% countywide), ahead of Republican Mitt Romney with 9,797 votes (43.0% vs. 40.2%) and other candidates with 194 votes (0.9% vs. 1.0%), among the 22,762 ballots cast by the township's 29,792 registered voters, for a turnout of 76.4% (vs. 74.5% in Burlington County).[68][69] In the 2008 presidential election, Democrat Barack Obama received 13,420 votes (57.2% vs. 58.4% countywide), ahead of Republican John McCain with 9,657 votes (41.2% vs. 39.9%) and other candidates with 220 votes (0.9% vs. 1.0%), among the 23,443 ballots cast by the township's 28,847 registered voters, for a turnout of 81.3% (vs. 80.0% in Burlington County).[70] In the 2004 presidential election, Democrat John Kerry received 11,618 votes (52.3% vs. 52.9% countywide), ahead of Republican George W. Bush with 10,382 votes (46.7% vs. 46.0%) and other candidates with 146 votes (0.7% vs. 0.8%), among the 22,231 ballots cast by the township's 27,385 registered voters, for a turnout of 81.2% (vs. 78.8% in the whole county).[71]

In the 2013 gubernatorial election, Republican Chris Christie received 8,696 votes (65.1% vs. 61.4% countywide), ahead of Democrat Barbara Buono with 4,341 votes (32.5% vs. 35.8%) and other candidates with 148 votes (1.1% vs. 1.2%), among the 13,354 ballots cast by the township's 29,635 registered voters, yielding a 45.1% turnout (vs. 44.5% in the county).[72][73] In the 2009 gubernatorial election, Republican Chris Christie received 7,082 votes (50.4% vs. 47.7% countywide), ahead of Democrat Jon Corzine with 6,149 votes (43.8% vs. 44.5%), Independent Chris Daggett with 617 votes (4.4% vs. 4.8%) and other candidates with 108 votes (0.8% vs. 1.2%), among the 14,047 ballots cast by the township's 29,086 registered voters, yielding a 48.3% turnout (vs. 44.9% in the county).[74]

The Mount Laurel Schools serve public school students in pre-Kindergarten through eighth grade. As of the 2011-12 school year, the district's eight schools had an enrollment of 4,201 students and 329.0 classroom teachers (on an FTE basis), for a studentteacher ratio of 12.77:1.[75] Schools in the district (with 2011-12 enrollment data from the National Center for Education Statistics)[76] are Countryside Elementary School[77] (grades PreK-4; 315 students), Fleetwood Elementary School[78] (PreK-4; 362), Hillside Elementary School[79] (K-4; 407), Larchmont Elementary School[80] (PreK-4; 359), Parkway Elementary School[81] (PreK-4; 410), Springville Elementary School[82] (PreK-4; 466), Mount Laurel Hartford School[83] for grades 5 & 6 (908 students) and Thomas E. Harrington Middle School[84] for grades 7 & 8 (974).[85][86] Parkway Elementary School was one of four schools in New Jersey recognized by the National Blue Ribbon Schools Program, awarded by the United States Department of Education, for the 200506 school year.[87]

Public school students from Mount Laurel in ninth through twelfth grades attend Lenape High School, located in Medford Township.[88][89] Shawnee is part of the Lenape Regional High School District, a regional secondary school district in Burlington County that also serves the eight municipalities of Evesham Township, Medford Lakes, Medford Township, Shamong Township, Southampton Township, Tabernacle Township and Woodland Township at its four high schools.[90][91]

Students from Mount Laurel Township, and from all of Burlington County, are eligible to attend the Burlington County Institute of Technology, a countywide public school district that serves the vocational and technical education needs of students at the high school and post-secondary level at its campuses in Medford and Westampton Township.[92]

As of May 2010[update], the township had a total of 170.19 miles (273.89km) of roadways, of which 115.86 miles (186.46km) were maintained by the municipality, 33.26 miles (53.53km) by Burlington County and 13.55 miles (21.81km) by the New Jersey Department of Transportation and 7.52 miles (12.10km) by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority.[93]

The New Jersey Turnpike passes through Mount Laurel Township, entering from Cherry Hill Township in the township's southwest corner and continuing for about 7.5 miles (12.1km) to Westampton Township at Mount Laurel's northern edge.[94] The Turnpike's James Fenimore Cooper rest area is located between Interchanges 4 and 5 northbound at milepost 39.4.[95] Mount Laurel also hosts the toll gate for Exit 4 of the Turnpike, which provides access to Route 73.[96]

Interstate 295 passes through the township, with three exits (Exit 36: Berlin/Tacony Bridge/Route 73, Exit 40: Moorestown/Mount Holly/Route 38, Exit 43: Delran/Rancocas Woods).[97] Other major thoroughfares through Mount Laurel are Route 38, Route 73 and County Route 537.

New Jersey Transit provides bus service to and from Philadelphia on routes 317 (from Asbury Park), the 413 route between Camden and Burlington and the 457 route between Moorestown Mall and Camden.[98][99]

The Greyhound Lines bus station at 538 Fellowship Road 395555N 745727.0W / 39.93194N 74.957500W / 39.93194; -74.957500 provides service to Philadelphia, New York City, Atlantic City and other points.[100]

People who were born in, residents of, or otherwise closely associated with Mount Laurel Township include:

Continued here:
Mount Laurel, New Jersey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Internet Marketing Bachelor’s Degree – Full Sail University

N

o longer a mere vehicle for information, the internet is a ubiquitous, driving force behind all aspects of our lives. Its where we work and play. Its where we go to seek out connection in a world that feels at once larger, and smaller, than ever before. Most of all, the internet has fundamentally changed how we function as consumers of everything from media to goods and services.

In Full Sails Internet Marketing bachelors program, youll explore the ongoing conversation between marketers and consumers on a professional level. Youll learn to develop dynamic content for a multitude of industries while providing clients with search engine optimization and analytics to ensure products reach their target audience.

To assist you on your professional journey, integrated portfolio courses and project based career modules are woven through the curriculum. Our Career Development advisors and services will be available to assist you throughout your career not just while you are a student. Click here to request additional program information about the Internet Marketing bachelors degree.

ONLINE | 32-MONTH BACHELOR'S

View a full listing of each course in the Internet Marketing degree and estimate your potential graduation date.

Read this article:
Internet Marketing Bachelor's Degree - Full Sail University

About NSA

Chartered in 1940, the National Sheriffs' Association is a professional association dedicated to serving the Office of Sheriff and its affiliates through police education, police training, and general law enforcement information resources. NSA represents thousands of sheriffs, deputies and other law enforcement, public safety professionals, and concerned citizens nationwide.

Through the years, NSA has provided programs for Sheriffs, their deputies, chiefs of police, and others in the field of criminal justice to perform their jobs in the best possible manner and to better serve the people of their cities, counties or jurisdictions.

The National Sheriffs' Association headquarters is located in Alexandria, Virginia and offers police training, police information, court security training, jail information and other law enforcement services to sheriffs, deputies, and others throughout the nation. NSA has worked to forge cooperative relationships with local, state, and federal criminal justice professionals across the nation to network and share information about homeland security programs and projects.

NSA serves as the center of a vast network of law enforcement information, filling requests for information daily and enabling criminal justice professionals, including police officers, sheriffs, and deputies, to locate the information and programs they need. NSA recognizes the need to seek information from the membership, particularly the sheriff and the state sheriffs' associations, in order to meet the needs and concerns of individual NSA members. While working on the national level, NSA has continued to seek grass-roots guidance, ever striving to work with and for its members, clients, and citizens of the nation.

NSA has through the years assisted sheriffs' offices, sheriffs' departments and state sheriffs' associations in locating and preparing applications for state and federal homeland security grant funding. The NSA record and reputation for integrity and dependability in the conduction of such public safety programs among government agencies is well recognized and has led to continuing opportunities to apply for grants on the national, state, and local levels as well as management of service contracts.

NSA's roots can be traced back to October 1888, when a group of sheriffs in Minnesota and surrounding states formed an organization, which they named the Inter-State Sheriffs' Association. The purpose of this association was to give opportunity for a wider, mutual acquaintance, to exchange ideas for more efficient service, and to assist one another in the apprehension of criminals.

Over the years the name was changed several times. It is assumed that as laws changed and law enforcement grew and expanded along with the country, the organization felt compelled to change its name to fit its membership and the times. When law enforcement officials in other states and Canada expressed interest in taking part in the Inter-State Sheriffs' Association, the group subsequently changed its name to the International Sheriffs' and Police Association. In 1908 the organization was briefly known as the National Sheriffs' Association before its name was amended as the International Sheriffs and Peace Officers Asociation and then later to the International Sheriffs and Police Association. The organization disbanded in 1938.

The Articles of Incorporation of the new National Sheriffs' Association were filed with the Secretary of State of the state of Ohio on September 26, 1940. Sheriff Walter O'Neil of Akron, Ohio was NSA's first president and held the first annual meeting in 1941 in St. Louis, Missouri. At this meeting a constitution was adopted and the organization's goals, policies, and objectives were agreed upon. NSA began publishing its periodical, The National Sheriff magazine, in February of the same year. NSA's first executive secretary (executive director) was Charles J. Hahn. It is believed that Hahn and the officials of the Buckeye State Sheriffs' Association of Ohio set about to form a national association for sheriffs.

The National Sheriffs' Association today is headquarted in Alexandria, VA and is a nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the level of professionalism among sheriffs, their deputies, and others in the field of criminal justice and public safety so that they may perform their jobs in the best possible manner and better serve the people of their cities, counties or jurisdictions.

For more on the history of NSA, consider ordering a copy of our 75th Anniversary Commemorative book. Click here to order today.

Go here to read the rest:
About NSA