Growth and Communism
We apply the growth accounting framework to the USSR and the PCR. Is China #39;s future more likely to feature stagnation or growth? What can we learn from compa...
By: Steve White
The rest is here:
Growth and Communism - Video
FNAF Communism comic voice
mochA I TOOK SO DAMN LONG IM SORRY OK HERE IT IS.
By: Harvey DoesEverything
Read this article:
FNAF Communism comic voice - Video
NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry struck an energetic and strident tone against terrorism, illegal immigration and President Barack Obama as he spoke to conservative and libertarian activists on Friday morning here at the Conservative Political Action Conference.
At no time in the last 25 years has the future been more uncertain and the world more dangerous than it is today, he warned in a speech delivered from behind a podium, saying it was time for the American people to hear the truth about the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, which he called the worst threat to freedom since communism.
Story Continued Below
They are a religious movement that seeks to take the world back to the 7th century, he said. It is their stated vow to kill as many Americans as possible.
Much of the first half of Perrys speech focused on criticism of Obamas foreign policy, with broadsides against the dangers of Russian President Vladimir Putin, Irans nuclear ambitions, and the Obama administrations dealings with Israel.
Perry, who left office last month and is considered a likely presidential candidate in 2016, also called for border security before any immigration deal and called drug gangs who he says spill across the border with Mexico a clear and present danger to the health and safety of all Americans.
Since his failed 2012 presidential bid, Perry has tried to rebrand himself as a more serious politician. Hes met with experts from Washington think tanks and made trips abroad to brush up on his foreign policy cred.
Moving to domestic policy during the latter half of his speech on Friday, Perry struck a populist tone and noted that the costs of health-care, housing and college tuition are all going up faster than wages.
Opportunity and security has been replaced by anxiety and worry for middle-class Americans, he said, and later added that its time to bring jobs and prosperity to Main Street, not just Wall Street.
Perry did not address his indictment last summer on abuse of office charges; his attorneys are trying to throw out the charges.
Originally posted here:
Perry: ISIL 'the worst threat to freedom since communism'
With the Syriza-led government locked in no-blink negotiations with Greece's creditors, especially Germany, it might be time to revive an old slogan of the left: Rosa Luxemburg's "socialism or barbarism." Restated for the 21st century, "socialism" simply means that a people's judgments about its own economic life -- the kind of work people do, the kind of security they enjoy, the kind of dignity they feel -- come before the supposedly iron rules of the international economy. It would also be fair to call it "economic democracy."
The condescending view of the Greeks as somehow not understanding economic reason and the direction of history writes off this kind of economic democracy as infeasible, archaic, and probably senseless. Alexis Tsipras, the leader of Syriza, the anti-austerity party at the head of Greece's new government, has described its "mission" as "the radical transformation of society across Europe, based on socialism and democracy." All of this convinces many observers that Syriza is a symptom of fantasy. Sometimes the diagnosis is directed at the Greeks themselves ("Don't they know socialism is over?"), sometimes to their admirers in Western Europe and the U.S. ("When will they stop idealizing other people's revolutions?"). More sympathetic commentators praise Syriza for being more realistic than it sounds and seeking a "responsible" way to finesse Brussels, Berlin, and Greek's creditors and ease the country out of a punishing austerity without changing the ground rules.
Syriza's government has a chance to reverse the lens. Economic democracy (or, as Syriza calls it, socialism) is politics that puts human needs first and accepts that market-based destabilization, impoverishment, and humiliation are not natural disasters or comeuppance for bad behavior but forms of political violence.
* * *
Syriza has an extraordinary uphill fight, both institutionally and ideologically. Their humane program sounds utopian to most ears. The "socialist" parties of Europe have committed themselves to the European project, which they, like Polanyi's old idealists, believe is the key to peace and prosperity -- so much that they are willing to double down on it at the cost of poverty and antagonism. And the interdependence of European fiscal rules, banking regimes, and so forth creates an obstacle course with a series of tripwires that could sink Greece's domestic banks or otherwise make things even worse.
Syriza is often described as an anti-austerity party, which sounds merely reactive. It is true that the party's support is a response to the disruption, insecurity, and humiliation that budget cuts and unemployment have visited on ordinary Greeks. When Tsipras talks about "an economy that will focus on people's needs" and "a welfare state that ensures education, health, and dignity for all," these rather abstract ideals have very concrete opposites: unemployed young people desperate to flee the country, pensioners pawning their coats and digging through trash for food, taxpayers whose money leaves the country in the form of debt service. Doesn't Syriza's "socialism" just mean "Not this!" -- as it did for many socialists in the 19th century, reacting against the fresh hell of the factory economy?
Maybe. But understanding the Greek situation this way prejudges practically every important question. It treats the current fiscal arrangements of Europe as hard facts, economic logic as hard rationality, and the impulse toward a different social world as a feeling, an emotional response to hard times. In that world, when Syriza declares itself a socialist party, it is announcing that it is unqualified to handle real power and responsibility. On this take, Syriza's voters are, almost by definition, emotional and reactive.
* * *
To see the world differently, it helps to go back to a tradition of thinking that developed before the total dominance of today's conventional economics. That tradition is long and rich, though any effort to use it today requires updating.
Partly by chance, in the week of Syriza's victory, I was rereading and teaching economic historian Karl Polanyi's 1944 classic, The Great Transformation, a touchstone work of non-Marxist democratic socialism. Polanyi asked how Europe had gone mad and bloodthirsty in the 1930s. His answer: For decades, the spread and rigorous enforcement of laissez-faire capitalism had been destabilizing communities, endangering and humiliating works, and despoiling the natural world. Under the artificial and draconian partial economic integration that the gold standard put in place, countries saw these crises amplified while their governments' power to address their crises was diminished. Humiliated, bewildered, and alienated, national populations struck back, either scrambling to recover a lost (and idealized) past or straining toward an imagined (often unattainable) future. Fascism was the worst product of this episode, which Polanyi described as spontaneous self-defense by "society."
Read the original here:
Jedediah Purdy: Socialism or barbarism? Syriza, economics and democracy
Ukraine War - Ukrainian armed forces base after shelling Debaltseve 15-02-2015
Ukraine War - Ukrainian armed forces base after shelling Debaltseve 15 02 2015 video february.
By: NoWar TV
Go here to see the original:
Ukraine War - Ukrainian armed forces base after shelling Debaltseve 15-02-2015 - Video