Archive for October, 2014

Democracy will lead to 'poor' dominating politics, say Hong Kong's China-backed governor

In what some will see as a veiled threat, he also said that Hong Kong had been "lucky" that Beijing had not yet felt the need to intervene in the stand-off. "There is a thin line between what we do in Hong Kong and what (leaders in) Beijing think or might think they have to do," he remarked.

China has offered Hong Kong the chance to vote for their next chief executive in 2017. But only those vetted by a committee expected to be loyal to Beijing will be allowed to stand a proposal activists have labelled a "fake democracy".

The protests are taking place against a backdrop of rising inequality and soaring housing costs which leave many young people with little prospect of renting, let alone buying, their own homes in a city with one of Asia's widest wealth gaps.

Though largely peaceful, the rallies saw increasing violence in the past week as police tried to clear some of the intersections.

The talks are scheduled to begin at 10am GMT on Tuesday and will be broadcast live on TV. Demonstrators say large screens will be erected at the protest camps.

But there are fears that neither side will find common ground, with both sides seemingly unwilling to compromise potentially setting up further clashes between protesters and police.

"I'm seriously worried about tonight," pro-democracy lawmaker Claudia Mo told AFP.

"If this is just going to be a political show where political animals form a political circus people will think: 'Well, let's just take to the streets again'."

Analysts and democracy lawmakers said Leung's comments on the poor were likely to inflame tensions further.

"It reflects the distrust the authorities have of the people ... and it also reflects how the current political system is biased for the rich and against the poor," said pro-democracy lawmaker Fernando Cheung.

Go here to see the original:
Democracy will lead to 'poor' dominating politics, say Hong Kong's China-backed governor

Why HK protests won't end soon, despite talks

"The pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong is not at all optimistic [about the talks]," Joseph Cheng, a professor at City University of Hong Kong and a pro-democracy activist, told CNBC. "We do not expect that Beijing will respond to our demands."

Then why hold talks at all?

"They want to make their case," Biswas said.

Read More Hong Kong clashes erupt despite imminent talks

The protests are in their third week, shutting down parts of the central business district and the Mongkok neighborhood, with protesters defying tear gas, pepper gas and police baton charges to keep their barricades up.

The protesters' primary demand is the ability to select candidates for Hong Kong's chief executive post, rather than being forced to choose from a slate pre-determined by Beijing. Other demands have included the resignation of the unpopular current chief executive, CY Leung.

Cheng believes the best possible outcome of the talks is that the negotiations would continue and eventually broaden so that the Hong Kong government might be able to eventually convince the mainland to reconsider its decision on candidate nominations.

"This is the best scenario we can hope to achieve," Cheng said.

Read More Commentary: The real issue in Hong Kong protests

Even that piecemeal, gradual outcome may not sit terribly well with the mainland.

Originally posted here:
Why HK protests won't end soon, despite talks

Buzludzha: A crumbling reminder of communism – Video


Buzludzha: A crumbling reminder of communism
Buzludzha was once the futuristic, flying-saucer shaped headquarters of the Communist Party in Bulgaria, but it is now a semi-ruin after being left to rot. For more multimedia content from...

By: The Economist

Read this article:
Buzludzha: A crumbling reminder of communism - Video

Why a communist threat will make the world a better place

QUESTION EVERYTHING Mong Palatino

A specter is badly needed today, the specter of communism. It is not enough to expose the evils of capitalism; we must offer and revive a leftwing alternative. To borrow a few words from a philosopher, we have already interpreted capitalism in various ways the point however is to change it.

True, Marxism is still the sharpest theoretical tool to understand the internal logic of capitalism. It is through Marxist political economy that we are able to analyze the dynamics between the recurring financial crisis, the boom and bust cycle of the modern economy, the expanding free trade regimes, and the ever worsening preventable miseries across the world. But alas, walking dead capitalism is still the dominant mode of production of our time.

The Soviet model has collapsed and the remaining so-called socialist states are either closet capitalists or burdened by the economic sanctions imposed by the West. They have little political and economic clout to disrupt the capitalist-dominated global relations. In the 1990s, free market doctrinaires even triumphantly proclaimed the end of history following the demise of Soviet Russia.

But is there really no alternative? Capitalist globalization imploded during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, 2008 Global Financial Crisis, the European Debt Crisis, and the current bubble with no name. Unless we consider precarious living as our fate, we must discard the defeatist and narrow thinking that our only choice is to embrace the dogma of capitalism.

Then there are those who peddle some fancy but dangerous illusions that modern capitalism is benign and that it is capable of reforming. They seek to mask the absolute horrors created by the system through sophisticated but disempowering academic discourse. Aside from refusing to name the system for what it really is, they mislead the public by misrepresenting the enactment of some petty reforms as the equivalent of overhauling the exploitative economic system.

Indeed, there were great variations between classical capitalism and really existing capitalism in the 20th century. After the Thirty-Years War (1914-1945), the Great Depression (1930), and the rise of Soviet Russia (1917), capitalism needed to become relevant by junking some of its core doctrines like absence of state intervention in the economic affairs. It has to embrace some neo-mercantilist (economic nationalism) policies in response to the Marxist-inspired command economy.

For todays millennials, it is difficult for them to think of communism as a viable alternative. For them, it is a theoretical failure and tragic political experiment that caused massive casualties. This is where the value of studying history becomes very crucial to teach the young that communism was actually an attractive ideology that gave hope to millions and changed the way we live in the past century. Communism inspired and supported anti-colonial movements, social uprisings, and radical scholarship especially after World War II. Was Ho Chi Minh nationalist or communist? Whatever his ideological mooring, he viewed communism as the path that would lead to the liberation of his people.

The age of free trade (1870-1914) created an interdependent global economy which concentrated wealth in the hands of few corporations and powerful states led by Great Britain. Poverty, inequality, injustice, and wars became the new normal of the capitalist world order. When the United States entered the Great Depression era, there was already a massive disenchantment with free trade policies. Many sought alternatives and they found socialist planning as appealing and necessary.

To prevent communism from overpowering the world, capitalism had to prove that it offers a superior way of life. And it succeeded not by clinging to the main tenets of economic liberalism but by adopting Marxist-inspired policies such as providing the welfare needs of the poor, distribution of free social services, and pursuing state-led economic planning. The visible hand of the state was used to create the right conditions for the realization of the theory of invisible hand. It is capitalism with socialist characteristics. Even East Asian dragon economies studied and implemented Marxist economic models (industry protection, promotion of infant industries) although they chose to remain under the US-led global alliance.

The rest is here:
Why a communist threat will make the world a better place

Kennedy Classics – Socialism: A Clear and Present Danger – Video


Kennedy Classics - Socialism: A Clear and Present Danger
Special: ======== One of the great concerns many Americans have is the economy. On a deeper level, the question is, what should the government provide for us in America? : Many people,...

By: D. James Kennedy Ministries

Read the rest here:
Kennedy Classics - Socialism: A Clear and Present Danger - Video