Mediaboss Marketing

(PRWEB) May 05, 2014

topseos.com has named OneIMS - Integrated Marketing Solutions the third best video search engine optimization service for May 2014. OneIMS - Integrated Marketing Solutions was selected due to their remarkable performance in the proprietary evaluation process. While there are thousands of agencies competing to be the best, the rankings consist of only the 10 best companies offering a variety of online marketing solutions.

The process for analyzing and selecting the top firms offering video SEO solutions involves a thorough analysis of the vital strengths of each individual agency. The five verticals of evaluation associated with successful video SEO campaigns include reporting methods, reach, off-page optimization, video keyword analysis, and on-page optimization. The results of this process are used to identify which companies to include within the ratings each month. The ratings are updated monthly to account for the latest developments within the industry.

In order to obtain a more in-depth outlook of the service, the topseos.com research team also connects with client references. Competing companies provide at least three client references to give the research team the opportunity to obtain insight directly from buyers. In some cases, customers contact topseos.com directly to voice their opinions.

OneIMS - Integrated Marketing Solutions has been named the third best video search engine optimization company based on a rigorous evaluation of their produced solutions. The independent research team has named them due to their continued achievement and their history of successful search engine marketing solutions. Those looking for a competent video search engine optimization solution to meet their specified needs should consider OneIMS - Integrated Marketing Solutions.

About OneIMS - Integrated Marketing Solutions

OneIMS is an integrated marketing services company founded in 2006. A variety of businesses have benefitted from successful web design, print marketing, email marketing, and online marketing campaigns spearheaded by OneIMS. Headquartered in Chicagoland, OneIMS provides quality services for clients extending across North America.

About topseos.com

topseos.com is a well-known independent authority on online marketing services. The central goal of topseos.com is to determine and name those individuals or services offering the best internet marketing solutions all over the world. A specialized team of researchers examine thousands of applicants each month who are seeking to be ranked as a top internet marketing product or service by the independent authority.

For additional information about OneIMS - Integrated Marketing Solutions, visit: http://oneims-integrated-marketing-solutions.topseosfirms.com.

Read the original:
topseos.com Announces OneIMS - Integrated Marketing Solutions as the Third Top Video SEO Firm for the Month of May 2014

While the media attention will focus on the Supreme Courts ruling inTown of Greece v. Galloway the legislative-prayer case the more interesting (and consequential) decision issued today was the Courts denial of review inDrake v. Jerejian, the Second Amendment case I previously discussed here. InDrake, the lower federal courts upheld an outrageous New Jersey law that denies the right to bear arms outside the home for self-defense just like the D.C. law at issue inDistrict of Columbia v. Heller denied the right to keep arms inside the home and today the Supreme Court let them get away with it.

Drake is but the latest in a series of cases that challenge the most restrictive state laws regarding the right to armed self-defense. Although the Supreme Court in Hellerdeclared that the Second Amendment protects an individual constitutional right, lower federal courts with jurisdiction over states like Maryland and New York have been willfully confused about the scope of that right, declining to protect it outsideHellers particular facts (a complete ban on functional firearms in the home).Its as if the Supreme Court announced that the First Amendment protects an individual right to blog about politics from your home computer, but then some lower courts allowed states to ban political blogging from your local Starbucks.

Yet each time, the Supreme Court has denied review.

New Jerseys is perhaps the most egregious restriction. In the Garden State, local law enforcement officials have full discretion to grant or deny a license to carry a firearm, which they may issue only if the applicant can prove a justifiable need (which in practice means aspecific, immediate threat to ones safety that cant be avoided in any way other than through possession of a handgun). Then, even if a local police chiefapproves a carry permit, the application goes to a judge for a hearing, during which the local prosecutor can oppose the permit. And even if the would-be gun-owner can successfully run that gauntlet, she gets a permit for two years, at which point she must repeat the entire process.

The dual review by two different branches of government is unusually burdensome, to say the least, and distinguishes New Jerseys approach in addition to the extreme definition of justifiable need from every other permitting regime in the country.Can you imagine the exercise of any other constitutional right being handled this way?

The effect of this regulatory scheme is that virtually nobody in New Jersey can use a handgun to defend themselves outside their home. The state law inverts how fundamental rights are supposed to work that the government must justify restrictions, not the right-holder the exercise and apparently the Supreme Court has no problem with that.

The lower court in Drakeapplied a deferential review far from the heightened scrutiny normally due an individual right enshrined in the Bill of Rights. It also assumed the legislatures good faith without requiring the state to show any evidence that a prohibitive-carry regime lowers the rate of gun crime, and excused what constitutional infringements the law causes because legislators acted beforeHellerclarified that the Second Amendment protected an individual right. To continue my previous analogy, its like a state law banning political blogging survived judicial review because the definitive Supreme Court ruling finding an individual right to political blogging didnt come down till after the state law was enacted.

What kind of a bizarro world are we living in where this is ok?

In Catos amicus brief inDrake, we posed an alternate question presented (legalese for the issue that a brief asks a court to resolve):

Was this Court serious in District of Columbia v. Heller when it ruled that the Second Amendment protects the individual right to keep and bear arms?

View original post here:
Supreme Court Wasnt Serious about the Second Amendment

The U.S. Supreme Court left intact a New Jersey law that requires a justifiable need to carry a handgun in public, sidestepping a dispute over the scope of the Constitutions gun-rights protections.

The justices today turned away an appeal by four New Jersey residents and two organizations, which said the Constitutions Second Amendment guarantees the right to carry a weapon for self-defense. A federal appeals court upheld the New Jersey measure.

The high court hasnt take up a gun-rights case since 2010, repeatedly rejecting appeals centering on the Second Amendments reach outside the home.

New Jersey is one of seven states that require an applicant to show a special need to get a permit to carry a handgun. That group includes California, whose rules are now before a federal appeals court, and New York, whose law the justices left intact a year ago.

The Second Amendment guarantees the right to carry weapons for the purpose of self-defense -- not just for self-defense within the home but for self-defense, period, the National Rifle Association argued in a brief backing the appeal.

Many states have relaxed their public-possession restrictions in recent years. In 1981, just three states -- Maine, Washington and Vermont -- let typical residents carry firearms in public without giving a reason.

In upholding the New Jersey law on a 2-1 vote, the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the measure was valid even if the Second Amendment applies outside the home. The appeals court pointed to a passage in a 2008 Supreme Court decision that said some longstanding gun restrictions were presumptively lawful.

The panel said New Jersey has had the justifiable need standard in some form since 1924.

New Jerseys legislature, long ago, made the predictive judgment that widespread carrying of handguns in public would not be consistent with public safety because of the inherent danger it poses, New Jersey officials, led by Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman, argued in court papers that urged the court to reject the appeal.

The Second Amendment Foundation and the Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs joined the four residents in challenging the measure. The residents were led by John Drake, who says he was denied a permit even though he operates a business that stocks ATM machines and often must carry large amounts of cash.

More here:
New Jersey Gun-Carrying Limit Left Intact by High Court

Ann Coulter Jokes with Al Sharpton
Love her or hate her, she is one of the few people that has the guts to joke with Al Sharpton like this.

By: clearlycanedian

Follow this link:
Ann Coulter Jokes with Al Sharpton - Video

Biggest Armies of European Union!
The biggest armies of the European Union! From the smallest Armed forces to the biggest!

By: Channel Poland

Read the original here:
Biggest Armies of European Union! - Video